Velorin Group

Command›Overview›Command Center›Job roll-up

Command Center OPS DIRECTION

Live roll-up for CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · data date 07/28/26 · Update 21

Contract

$61.60M

+$2,817 approved CO

Billed to date

$14.88M

24.2% of contract · App 17

Retainage held

$1.04M

6.98% blended · 10% on retained lines

SOV exceptions

$2,316,351 billed above revised SV

Field complete

1.4%

earned · 316,552 hrs EAC

Open issues

3 delay notices pending

Cash flow — billed · received · cost
CUMULATIVE $MAPP 06 – APP 17

Billed — Received — Cost incurred — Unpaid gap

Earned value
EVM

CPI — cost performance0.96

SPI — schedule performance0.91

VAC — variance at completion−$1.84M

Margin by cost code
$K vs. estimate

Cash position — 13 week forecast
$M1 BREACH

Weekly inflow Weekly outflow Cumulative cash Below zero

Executive scorecard — portfolio
5 ACTIVE JOBSGROSS MARGIN TREND, 12 MO

On plan Margin eroding Negative margin — escalate Portfolio weighted margin 6.1%

Electrical One-Line — Area 1
EPMS LIVErev 12

KEY / ISO / TSK

Energized & accepted Under test / LOTO Standby source Not built

Built from data you already have. Systems (EPMS/BMS/EPO), EPO One-Line, Switching Plans, Arc Flash Boundaries, Wire & Amp Sizing, KEY/ISO/TSK Viewer and Energized Work Permits all exist as modules today — this view is those seven stitched into one picture, with Cx level and EWP state drawn on the equipment instead of living in separate tables. I have not seen your V1 one-line vision — point me at it and I'll match it rather than invent it.

Information architecture

Today	21 groups · 221 modules · flat
Proposed	10 modules · 38 sections · 3 levels

Duplicate / overlap found	n
Asset Register · Registry · Labels · Lifecycle · Turnover Gate · Management	6
Document Vault · Documents Vault · Vault Dashboard	3
Users & Roles · Users & Roles/Permissions · Roles & Permissions · Owner Roles	4
Reports · Reports Hub · PM · EM · Cx Reports	5
Action Items (listed twice)	2
Compliance · Compliance Docs · Compliance Log · Safety+Compliance	4
Separate "Dashboard" modules per discipline	11

Every one of the 221 survives — nothing is deleted. They collapse into sections, and the eleven per-discipline dashboards become one dashboard that changes with the module you're in.

Revised SOV — lines where billed-to-date now exceeds the scheduled value
verified 6 ways9 EXCEPTIONS

Item	Description	Billed to date	App 17 SV	Revised SV	Over
0044	Area 5 Cable Tray Ladder Racks	764,596.28	1,003,037.00	113,990.16	650,606.12
0042	Area 5 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,057,406.25	1,339,955.00	604,843.52	452,562.73
0045	Area 5 Low Voltage Raceways BMS EPMS	705,926.42	827,198.00	284,695.05	421,231.37
0046	Area 5 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling	281,953.88	510,521.00	0.00	281,953.88
0049	Area 5 Mechanical Power Raceways	826,545.78	1,620,678.00	565,597.98	260,947.80
0043	Area 5 Power Branch Devices	736,855.91	1,160,027.00	577,483.52	159,372.39
0020	Area 2 Vesda Raceways Cabling	179,664.65	326,663.00	125,734.66	53,929.99
0010	Area 1 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling	316,523.02	510,521.00	288,439.35	28,083.67
0019	Area 2 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling	296,102.18	510,521.00	288,439.35	7,662.83
	Total exposure				2,316,350.78

Schedule & Controls›Project Management›Overview

Project Management

Robert Nguyen · Project Manager · CTP Lancaster LPE-01

Contract to date

$61.60M

+$2,817 CO

Earned

$14.88M

24.2%

Open PCOs

$1.87M exposure

Delay notices

1 lapses in 2d

RFIs open

9 over 14 days

Delay notices — the clock is contractual
1 LAPSING

Ref	Activity	Reason	Days	Float	Impact	Notice due	State
DN-041	A3 Rough-in ceiling grid	Predecessor not complete — GC	6	3	3d critical	in 2 days	DRAFT
DN-040	A5 Vesda test ports	Access not released — owner	4	11	none	in 6 days	WITH PM
DN-038	A1 Fire alarm devices	Material not on site	2	18	none	sent 07/22	SUBMITTED

All budgets — the PM sees every one, engineering included
roll-up

Budget	Owner	Allocated	Committed	Burned	Forecast	Var
Job — labor	Robert Nguyen · PM	$28,410,000	$11,204,000	$6,982,400	$28,940,000	+1.9%
Job — material	Robert Nguyen · PM	$19,240,000	$14,880,000	$4,118,900	$19,102,000	−0.7%
Engineering	Dana Whitfield · Engineering PM	$1,900,000	$1,412,000	$742,180	$1,986,400	+4.5%
Prefab / shop	Marcus Hale · Shop	$4,180,000	$2,090,000	$1,204,600	$4,096,000	−2.0%
GC / admin / fee	Robert Nguyen · PM	$7,866,763	$3,110,000	$2,502,444	$7,866,763	on
Total		$61,596,763	$32,696,000	$15,550,524	$61,991,163	+0.6%

The Engineering PM runs the engineering budget day to day — subs, staff, deliverables, hours. The overall PM owns all of them, engineering included, and it rolls into the job forecast like any other line. Separate accountability, one set of books.

4-week look-ahead — manpower required
from est_persons

Week	Area	Scope	Men/day	Available	Gap
Aug 03	A1 · A5	Branch + tray	18	22	OK
Aug 10	A1 · A3 · A5	Mech power terminations	24	22	SHORT 2
Aug 17	A3 · A4	Lighting + devices	31	22	SHORT 9
Aug 24	A4 · ROOF	Heat trace + roof power	27	22	SHORT 5

Three weeks out you are nine electricians short on the week of Aug 17. That is the number worth acting on today — hiring, shifting crews or resequencing all still work at three weeks. At one week none of them do.

Engineering & VDC›Delivery›Engineering PM

Engineering

Dana Whitfield · Engineering PM · engineering budget, subs and staff — separate from the job PM

Eng budget

$1.90M

line 0058 · not the job SOV

Burned

$742K

39% · 4,180 hrs

Deliverables

148

61 done · 12 late

Late

9 with Pinnacle

Model rev

R12

3rd-party adjusted

Areas by column line — scope assigned per company
grid A–H / 1–5

—

Area	Column lines	Modeling	Submittals	Due	Hrs allocated	Burned	State
A1	A–C / 3–5	Pinnacle VDC	E-J in-house	08/14/26	1,240	1,118	ON TRACK
A2	D–E / 4–5	Pinnacle VDC	E-J in-house	08/28/26	1,240	402	ON TRACK
A3	F–G / 3–5	TMS (3rd party)	Chewning & Wilmer	09/11/26	1,180	1,310	OVER 130 HRS
A4	A–D / 1–3	E-J in-house	E-J in-house	09/25/26	1,340	288	NOT STARTED

Area is defined by column line, not by free text. Do that once and the schedule, production report, prefab release, QA/QC and turnover all share the same spine — today area is a text column on sched_activities and nothing agrees with anything else.

Model in → VE → out
Revit · IFC · NWD

Model dropped

CTP-A1-ALLTRADES.rvt · 1.37 GB · R12

THEY DO

VE to code

Parsed, checked to NEC + spec, constructability pass

VELORIN

Findings report

12 items · $486K identified

VELORIN

VE’d IFC model

Theirs to load into their own system

VELORIN

Prefab + field drawings

Shop packages, BOM, rack & spool

VELORIN

Drop a Revit model here We parse it, VE it to code and hand back a findings report. You decide what happens next.

VE findings — 12 items · $854,200 identified

#	Finding	Area	Basis	Value	Status
01	Cable tray oversized vs calculated fill — 36" to 24" on 3 runs	A1	NEC 392.22	$118,400	ACCEPTED
02	Parallel feeder runs can combine — 14 conduits to 9	A1 · A5	NEC 310.10(H)	$96,250	PROPOSED
03	Rack elevations conflict with mech gallery at G/4 — rework risk	A3	Clash · constructability	$61,900	PROPOSED

04	Homerun consolidation, Area 2 lighting branch	A2	NEC 210.19	$54,100	PROPOSED
05	Busway vs feeder re-evaluation on ROOF mech power	ROOF	NEC 368	$47,800	PROPOSED
06	Heat trace circuit consolidation	A4	Spec 26 05 33	$38,900	PROPOSED
07	Fire alarm device count vs coverage calc	A1–A5	NFPA 72	$31,200	PROPOSED
08	Vesda sampling pipe routing shortened at G/4	A3	NFPA 76	$28,650	PROPOSED
09	EPO loop re-segmented — 2 panels avoided	A1 · A2	NEC 645.10	$26,400	UNDER REVIEW
10	Ladder rack drops aligned to rack rows — less field cut	A5	Constructability	$24,900	PROPOSED
11	Low-voltage pathway shared with BMS where separation allows	A1–A4	NEC 725.136	$19,750	UNDER REVIEW
12	Mech power terminations pre-made in shop, not field	A5	Prefab	$18,950	PROPOSED
	Total identified			$854,200	1 ACCEPTED

Everything here ships with the platform — no locked modules, no upgrade wall. What Velorin sells on top is the work: our engineers building the VE’d model, the prefab packages and the field drawings. Software is all-in; labor is a service line.

Quality · Cx · Energy›Energy Marshal›One-Line & LOTO

Energy Marshal

Live electrical state · EWP and LOTO drawn on the gear · CTP Lancaster LPE-01

Cx complete

184 of 302 assets

+9 this week

QA / QC

1,214 of 1,640 signed

31 witness pending

ITP hold points

7 held open

2 blocking A3

Turnover ready

Admin vol accepted

A1 due Oct

Energized

2 EWP · 3 LOTO active

3 locks out

Electrical single-line — redundant A / B
EPMS LIVErev 12

⚡ EWP-114 ACTIVE · UPS-1A 🔒 LOTO-031 · XFMR-B SEC 🔒 LOTO-034 · MDB-B TIE

Energized / accepted Standby source Under test LOTO applied EWP active Not built / de-energized Emergency feed

Two independent sources, two transformers, two main boards, tied at 480 V — so the picture answers “what is still fed if I take this out?” Every LOTO and every energized-work permit is drawn on the gear it applies to, not filed in a list somewhere else. Click any device for its Cx level, EWP and lock history.

Engineering & VDC›Model›Digital Twin

Digital Twin 2D + 3D

CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · E-J Electric (electrical sub) · GC Turner · model R14 · geometry linked to asset tags, areas defined by column line

Model rev

R14

published 07/24/26 · IFC 4.3

LOD

400

L1–L3 · L4 still LOD 350

Linked assets

302

96% of tagged equipment

Open clashes

−27 since R13 · 4 hard

Prefab released

61%

184 of 302 assemblies

Twin sync latency

2.4s

push subscription · p95 4.1s

3D model — Level 1–4 isometric
grid A–H / 1–8R14 · LOD 400SYNCED

depth-sorted · 302 linked assets

Switchgear / busway UPS & battery PDU / generator Transformer / mech plant Service entrance & distribution Hard clash

2D plan — Level 2 · grid A–H / 1–8
E-201 rev C1/8" = 1'-0"IFC 4.3

room numbers from GC room schedule

Electrical / UPS room (shaded) PDU run · hatched work area Grid bubble A–H / 1–8 UPS footprint ATS footprint

Asset tag	Room	Grid	Area	Model element	Cx	Prefab
SG-MDBA	2-104	A–B / 1–2	A1	GUID 3kQ9…a71	L4 DONE	RELEASED
SG-MDBB	2-106	A–B / 2–3	A1	GUID 8vT2…c04	L4 DONE	RELEASED
UPS-1A	2-108	A–B / 3–5	A1	GUID 2mR7…f18	L3 IN PROG	RELEASED
UPS-1B	2-108	A–B / 3–5	A1	GUID 2mR7…f19	L3 IN PROG	IN FAB
ATS-1	2-110	A–B / 5–6	A2	GUID 9pL4…b62	L2 DONE	IN FAB
BW-R1	2-100	C / 2–3	A2	GUID 5nD1…e33	L2 DONE	RELEASED
PDU-2A-07	2-130	E / 2	A3	GUID 7hK8…d90	NOT STARTED	HELD — CLASH

Not connected. There is no EPMS/BMS historian feed for this job, and no live source system of any kind is attached. Everything shown on this screen comes from the IFC model export, which is parsed on ingest — it is not a telemetry feed and it does not update when the building changes. Push delivery to the browser is how this panel is intended to work once a source system is connected.

Field Operations›Test & Inspection›MDB-A · ITP-4.2

Field Test Execution OFFLINE CAPABLE

480 V distribution acceptance testing · witnessed hold points · per-step append-only sync · CTP Lancaster LPE-01

Offline mode armed Captured locally14 steps Last sync06:41 SignalNone · Level 2 vault Sync is per-step append-only — every result is its own event keyed by step + tester + device clock, so R. Alvarez on MDB-A and T. Reyes on MDB-B can both work the same ITP and neither overwrites the other when signal returns. 14 QUEUED 0 CONFLICTS

Test record header
ITP-4.2rev CIN PROGRESS

Asset tag

MDB-ASQ-D Masterpact MTZ2 · 3000 A · 480/277 V

Procedure

ITP-4.2 rev C480 V distribution — insulation resistance & torque verification

Area

Grid C-4 / Level 2Electrical room 2-E12

Test date

2026-07-28Started 06:12 · device clock UTC-07

Instrument set

Megger MIT525cal 2026-02-11 · CAT-2026-0418

Performed by

R. Alvarez

Ricardo Alvarez · Journeyman ElectricianE-J Electric · ID EJ-4471

NJ lic. 34EI01994300Signed 2026-07-28 06:12

sig 9f3a…c1d7 · signed on-device · not yet synced

Witnessed by — QA/QC

D. Kwon

Daniel Kwon · QA/QC ManagerVelorin Cx · ID VQ-0212

NETA Level III L3-88214Signed 2026-07-28 06:15

sig 4b71…8e02 · hold points 04, 06, 07 witnessed live

Test sequence — ITP-4.2 · 12 steps
NETA ATS 7.1NFPA 70E1 NCR

11 of 12 steps recorded

9 PASS1 FAIL1 N/A1 OPEN

Verify LOTO applied and zero-energy state confirmed at MDB-A line side (all three phases + neutral to ground)HOLD

LOTO-031by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon06:18

reading0.0 VAC

Acceptance

Absence of voltage verified phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground; meter proven live-dead-live on a known source before and after. Any reading above 1.0 VAC fails.

Reference

NFPA 70E 120.5(7) · OSHA 1910.147 · site EEWP procedure LPE-SAF-004

Tooling

Fluke T6-1000 non-contact + Fluke 87V, proving unit PRV240FS

PPE

Cat 2 · 12 cal/cm² arc rating, Class 0 gloves, face shield

LOTO box + locks06:16

meter 0.0 VAC A-B06:18

Visual and mechanical inspection — enclosure, bus joints, phase barriers, insulators, arc chutes, nameplate and phase labeling

by R.Alvarez06:313 photos

resultNo defects

Acceptance

No corrosion, tracking, moisture ingress or foreign material. Bus joints clean, silver-plated surfaces unmarred, all phase barriers seated and captive hardware present.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.1.1 visual & mechanical · Schneider 51201-101-01 rev 9

Tooling

Inspection mirror, 1000 lm light, lint-free wipes, Loctite ML cleaner

bus joint A-B-C06:29

phase barriers06:30

nameplate06:31

Verify installed configuration against drawing E-402 rev C — breaker frame, sensor plug, feeder destinations and neutral bonding at service point

by R.Alvarez06:44

as-builtMatches rev C

Acceptance

Frame 3200 A / sensor 3000 A confirmed on trip unit label; main bonding jumper present at service disconnect only; no downstream neutral-ground bond.

Reference

NEC 250.24(A)(5) · drawing E-402 rev C · submittal SUB-0311

Tooling

Tablet with issued-for-construction set, clamp meter for bond check

trip unit label06:43

MBJ at service06:44

Torque verification — line-side main lugs L1/L2/L3 to 375 in-lb, apply witness (torque) marks to each connectionHOLD

by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon07:023 photos

applied375 in-lb

Acceptance

375 in-lb +0 / −5% on each phase lug. Wrench must break cleanly with no further rotation on re-check. Torque stripe applied across lug body, hardware and conductor after acceptance.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.1.2 · Schneider torque table 51201-101-01 tbl 4 · NEC 110.14(D)

Tooling

CDI 2503MFRPH click wrench, cal 2026-05-02 (cert TW-9931), yellow torque-seal

torque mark L107:01

torque mark L207:01

torque mark L307:02

wrench cal tag06:58

Torque verification — load-side lugs, neutral bar and ground bus landings to 275 in-lb, mark each connection

by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon07:24

applied275 in-lb

Acceptance

275 in-lb +0 / −5% on all 22 landings including neutral bar and ground bus. Aluminum conductors brushed and inhibitor applied before landing.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.1.2 · UL 486A-486B · manufacturer torque table tbl 4

Tooling

CDI 2503MFRPH click wrench (cert TW-9931), Penetrox A-13, wire brush

neutral bar marks07:22

ground bus marks07:24

Insulation resistance, phase-to-phase at 1000 VDC for 1 minute — A-B, B-C, C-A with breaker openHOLD

by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon07:51corrected to 20 °C

lowest1.2 GΩ

Acceptance

Minimum 100 MΩ at 1000 VDC, 1 minute, temperature corrected to 20 °C. No phase may read below 50% of the mean of the other two.

Readings

A-B 1.4 GΩ · B-C 1.2 GΩ · C-A 1.5 GΩ — ambient 31 °C, RH 46%

Reference

NETA ATS 7.1.3 tbl 100.1 · IEEE 43 polarisation index

Tooling

Megger MIT525 (cal CAT-2026-0418), guarded leads, discharge stick

MIT525 A-B07:47

MIT525 B-C07:49

MIT525 C-A07:51

Insulation resistance, phase-to-ground at 1000 VDC for 1 minute — feeder MDB-A-07 to PP-2C, phase BHOLD

by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon08:14 NCR-0418RETEST AFTER REPAIR

B-G4.1 MΩ

Acceptance

Minimum 100 MΩ phase-to-ground at 1000 VDC. Reading of 4.1 MΩ is 96% below the acceptance floor — suspected jacket damage where the feeder passes the pull box at column C-4.

Disposition

NCR-0418 raised 08:19, assigned to E-J Electric. Conductor to be pulled back and inspected; retest of steps 07 and 09 required before energization.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.3.1 tbl 100.1 · NEC 110.7 insulation integrity

Tooling

Megger MIT525 (cal CAT-2026-0418) · re-verified against known 1 MΩ standard after reading

4.1 MΩ on display08:14

pull box C-408:17

jacket abrasion08:18

Ground continuity and bonding resistance — MDB-A ground bus to grounding electrode conductor bar

by R.Alvarez08:36

measured0.08 Ω

Acceptance

Bonding path below 0.5 Ω measured with a minimum 10 A test current. Ground electrode system resistance separately recorded at 3.1 Ω (fall-of-potential).

Reference

NETA ATS 7.13 · NEC 250.53(A)(2) · IEEE 81

Tooling

Megger DET4TCR2 clamp-on, 10 A bonding tester

GEC bar landing08:35

0.08 Ω reading08:36

Contact resistance across main breaker poles (DLRO, 100 A injection) — all three poles closed

by R.Alvarez09:02A 21 · B 23 · C 20 µΩ

highest23 µΩ

Acceptance

Microhm value at or below 50 µΩ, and no pole deviating more than 50% from the lowest pole. Spread here is 15% — acceptable.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.6.1.1 · Schneider MTZ2 service bulletin SB-2214

Tooling

Megger DLRO100X at 100 A, Kelvin clips on bus stabs

DLRO pole A09:00

DLRO pole C09:02

Primary injection and trip-curve verification of MTZ2 Micrologic 6.0X (long-time, short-time, instantaneous, ground fault)

marked N/A by D.Kwon09:20covered by third-party report

sourceShermco rpt

Why N/A

Primary injection is contractually assigned to the third-party NETA firm. This step is satisfied by an uploaded report, not by an in-app reading — see Third-party results below, document SH-MDBA-PI-001.

Acceptance

Trip at 300% of long-time pickup between 6.0 s and 11.0 s; instantaneous pickup 5,760–7,040 A; ground fault trip at 1,200 A ±10%.

Reference

NETA ATS 7.6.1.2 · coordination study CS-LPE-01 rev 4

test set on gear09:18

Verify trip unit settings against coordination study CS-LPE-01 rev 4 and photograph the final setting screen

by R.Alvarezwitness D.Kwon09:41

LT / ST0.9 / 4x

Acceptance

Long-time pickup 0.9 (2700 A) band 12 s; short-time 4x band 0.2 s I²t out; instantaneous off; ground fault 1200 A band 0.3 s. Settings locked and password applied.

Reference

Coordination study CS-LPE-01 rev 4 sheet 6 · NEC 240.87

Tooling

Micrologic HMI, Ecoreach export to job record

setting screen09:40

GF setting09:41

Restore gear — reinstall barriers and covers, re-torque cover hardware, remove LOTO-031, apply test tag and turn over to CxHOLD

BLOCKED BY NCR-0418assigned R.Alvareznot started

reading— enter result

Acceptance

All barriers and covers reinstalled with captive hardware at 45 in-lb, LOTO removed under the same permit that applied it, and green test tag signed by performer and witness.

Blocked

Cannot close while NCR-0418 is open on step 07. Retest of the phase-B feeder must pass before restoration is recorded.

Reference

NFPA 70E 120.5(13) · site turnover procedure LPE-CX-002

Point-to-point terminations — MDB-A
10 of 10 conductors1 FAIL

CKT #	Cond	From	To	Size / insul	Megger 1000 V	Continuity	Torque	Performed by	Witness	Status
MDB-A-01	A	MDB-A main lug L1	XFMR-T1 X1	500 kcmil XHHW-2	1.4 GΩ	0.06 Ω	375 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-01	B	MDB-A main lug L2	XFMR-T1 X2	500 kcmil XHHW-2	1.3 GΩ	0.06 Ω	375 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-01	C	MDB-A main lug L3	XFMR-T1 X3	500 kcmil XHHW-2	1.5 GΩ	0.05 Ω	375 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-01	N — neutral	MDB-A neutral bar	XFMR-T1 X0	500 kcmil XHHW-2	980 MΩ	0.04 Ω	275 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-01	G — equip ground	MDB-A ground bus	Building GEC bar	3/0 AWG bare Cu	n/a — bonded	0.08 Ω	275 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-07	A	MDB-A CB-07 load L1	PP-2C main lug L1	4/0 AWG THHN	1.1 GΩ	0.09 Ω	250 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-07	B	MDB-A CB-07 load L2	PP-2C main lug L2	4/0 AWG THHN	4.1 MΩ	0.09 Ω	250 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	FAIL · NCR-0418
MDB-A-07	C	MDB-A CB-07 load L3	PP-2C main lug L3	4/0 AWG THHN	1.2 GΩ	0.08 Ω	250 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-07	N — neutral	MDB-A neutral bar	PP-2C neutral bar	4/0 AWG THHN	940 MΩ	0.07 Ω	250 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS
MDB-A-07	G — equip ground	MDB-A ground bus	PP-2C ground bar	4 AWG THHN green	n/a — bonded	0.11 Ω	120 in-lb	R. Alvarez	D. Kwon	PASS

Phase A Phase B Phase C Neutral — shaded row, insulated from ground downstream of service Ground — shaded row, continuity only, no megger

Third-party test results — auto-verified against acceptance criteria
NETA firm: Shermco1 OUT OF TOLERANCE

Drop third-party test reports here PDF, CSV or native instrument export · values are parsed and checked against ITP-4.2 acceptance criteria · queued if offline

Shermco — MDB-A Primary Injection & Trip Curve Verification.pdf VERIFIED PASS

SH-MDBA-PI-001 · 2.4 MB · uploaded 09:26 · 14 values parsed · satisfies step 10

LT trip at 300%8.2 saccept 6.0 – 11.0 sOK

Instantaneous pickup6,410 Aaccept 5,760 – 7,040 AOK

Ground fault trip1,188 Aaccept 1,080 – 1,320 AOK

Tech / certM. Ortega · NETA Level IIIcert current to 2027-03OK

Shermco — MDB-A-07 Insulation Resistance (phase-to-ground).pdf VERIFIED FAIL

SH-MDBA-IR-004 · 1.1 MB · uploaded 08:52 · 9 values parsed · 1 outside tolerance

Phase A to ground1.1 GΩaccept at or above 100 MΩOK

Phase B to ground4.1 MΩexpected at or above 100 MΩ — read 4.1 MΩ, 96% below floorOUT OF TOLERANCE

Phase C to ground1.2 GΩaccept at or above 100 MΩOK

Temp correction31 °C to 20 °Cfactor 1.98 applied per IEEE 43OK

Independently confirms field step 07. Auto-raised NCR-0418 and blocked step 12 restoration.

Megger MIT525 native export — MDB-A megger set.csv VERIFIED PASS

device export · 46 KB · uploaded 07:56 · 9 of 9 readings within tolerance · instrument cal verified

Lowest reading980 MΩaccept at or above 100 MΩOK

Instrument calCAT-2026-0418valid to 2027-02-11OK

Powell — MDB-A factory acceptance report.pdf QUEUED — PARSE ON SYNC

held on device · 6.8 MB · added 09:31 · will auto-verify when signal returns

How results sync. Nothing on this screen uses last-writer-wins. Each step result is written as its own immutable event keyed by asset + step + tester + device timestamp, appended to the record and never replaced — so if R. Alvarez records step 07 in the Level 2 vault while D. Kwon records step 09 upstairs, both events land intact and the record simply shows two authors. A later result for the same step does not erase the earlier one; it is stacked as a retest with its own signature, which is how NCR-0418 keeps the failing 4.1 MΩ reading on the record after the retest passes. Unsynced work is signed on-device with the tester's credential and hashed at capture time, so the queued 14 steps carry the same evidentiary weight as synced ones — photos, EXIF, GPS and instrument cal IDs travel with the event. Conflicts are only possible if two testers sign the same step; that surfaces as a dual-entry review for QA/QC rather than a silent overwrite.

Today’s tests

MDB-A — ITP-4.211 of 12 · you

ACTIVE

ATS-1B — ITP-4.618 of 18 · T. Reyes

SIGNED

PP-2C — ITP-4.2blocked · NCR-0418

HELD

UPS-1A — ITP-5.1queued · needs EWP-114

QUEUED

MDB-B — ITP-4.24 of 12 · T. Reyes offline

OFFLINE

Sync queue14

step 07 result + 3 photos08:18PENDING

NCR-0418 draft08:19PENDING

step 08 result08:36PENDING

step 09 DLRO x309:02PENDING

Powell FAT report 6.8 MB09:31PENDING

steps 01–06 + signatures06:41SYNCED

witness sig D. Kwon06:41SYNCED

Queue size on device41.2 MB

Oldest unsynced event08:18

Merge conflicts0

ITP-4.2 completion

92%

Steps recorded11 / 12

Hold points witnessed4 / 5

Photos captured27

Open NCRs1

Ready for turnoverNo — NCR open

Field · Safety›Site Safety Map›CTP Lancaster LPE-01

Site Safety Map PUSH · SSE STREAM 14 BOARDS · 63 DEVICES SUBSCRIBED

Arch plan A-101 overlaid with live hazard zones · crane swings, energization and pressurization notices fan out to every subscribed phone, tablet and trailer TV the moment the safety manager commits them.

Hazards
0 PLACED

Click to arm · click map to drop

Placed markers drag with the finger or cursor. Select a marker and press Delete, or tap the × on its label, to pull it off the board.

Site overview — Bldg 1 Level 1 · arch A-101 rev 7
SCALE 1:400PLACE MODE

RADIUS 220 FT ACK 41 / 63

Active swing / energized Crane, excavation, overhead Water & sprinkler systems LOTO & lift plan Life safety & muster

13:58:04Board synced — 14 trailer TVs and 63 devices joined the safety channel over SSE.

13:52:41Hazard placed — Excavation / trench at grid E-6, depth 5 ft, sloped. R. Alvarez

13:40:12Permit issued — Hot work HW-238, MECH YARD, expires 15:00.

Active notices

T-30Crane swing — TC-2Roof steel pick, grid F-4 to H-7 · 220 ft radius · affects MECH YARD, Laydown B, Gate 2 · 31 in zone

14:00Energization — MDB-BELEC 1 · EWP-117 · E-J Electric crew of 6 · barricade line at column G

T-75Sprinkler pressurizationLevel 2 Zone 3 · ATS Fire · 175 psi hydro · ceilings closed to all trades

0:47Hot work permit HW-238MECH YARD pipe welding · fire watch D. Nkemelu · expires 15:00

Push timeline — TC-2 swing

STAGE 1

T-60 notice sent

Pushed to 63 devices · 14 boards · 58 acked

13:20 · DELIVERED

STAGE 2

T-30 notice sent

Re-push with zone map · 61 acked, 2 chased by super

13:50 · DELIVERED

STAGE 3

Swing active

Hash zone live on every board · entry blocked

14:20 · LIVE

STAGE 4

All clear

Zone released, boards return to green

PENDING

Who’s on site

E-J Electric24

Turner (GC)9

Lighthouse Mechanical6

ATS Fire Protection4

Total badged in43

Inside a live hazard zone31

Notice acknowledged41 / 63

Push only — there is no polling and there are no webhooks anywhere in this system. The safety board holds one server-initiated stream per subscriber (SSE for trailer TVs and desktops, WebSocket for the phone and tablet apps) and the server fans a notice out to every open connection the instant the safety manager commits it. Nothing on a device ever asks the server “is there anything new”; if a device drops, the server replays the missed sequence on reconnect from the notice log, so a phone that was in a dead spot in the MECH YARD still lands the T-30 the moment it comes back. TV mode is a read-only board for trailer and gang-box screens — no palette, no editing, auto-rotating between the live map, the active notice list and the muster roll on a 20 second cycle, and it wakes to full red the second a swing goes active. Every notice is acknowledged per person, not per company: each push carries a notice ID, the device returns an ack with the badge ID and timestamp, and the safety manager sees a live 41 / 63 count plus the names of who has not read it — so a crane swing does not start until the people actually inside the radius have confirmed, and the all clear is logged with the same per-person receipt for the incident record.

UI PROTOTYPE. This is the Energy Marshal / LOTO deck rendered with a representative Lancaster gear layout so you can judge the interface. The device list, lock holders and log entries here are sample data, not the job database — nothing on this page has been read from 250750HB. When it is wired, every figure follows the same rule as the rest of Velorin: anything not sourced shows a dash, never a zero.

Energized · Do not touch

of 47 devices in scope

Isolations locked

31 personal locks hung

Verified zero energy

live-dead-live proven

Locked · not yet verified

needs a qualified person

Permits past 12 h

—

shift change re-sign due

Workers on a lock

31ppl

4 crews · 2 trades

Unknown state

—

2 devices never surveyed

Switchgear lineup · SUS-1 Area 2 · Elec Room 2-A

Energized Open, not locked Locked & tagged Verified zero energy Unknown

Feeder one-line · isolation points

Every ⊗ is a point that must be opened, locked and proven dead before the downstream branch is safe. A branch is only drawn green when the device feeding it is verified — not when it is merely switched off.

Panelboard schedule · LP-2A-1 42 pole · 225 A · 208Y/120 V

Open permits —

Permit	Device	Marshal	Opened	Locks	State	Age

Approach boundaries · NFPA 70E

ARC FLASH

—

LIMITED

—

RESTRICTED

—

Boundaries come from the incident-energy study on the label, not from a calculation this app invents. No label on file means a dash and a survey task, never a default.

Group lock box · GLB-07

GROUP LOCK BOX — locks

The isolation key is inside. The box does not open until the last personal lock comes off.

Site LOTO QR · worker onboarding

Scan at the gate or on the gear door

Captures name, email and mobile, sends a Velorin invite, and lands the worker as a basic site user — LOTO, toolbox talks, site safety. No cost, no billing, no margin, ever.

Energy log append only · nothing here can be edited or deleted

Engineering & VDC›Document Vault›Drawings · Electrical — E-series

Document Vault SHOWS THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT

CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · 4,431 controlled documents · every revision retained · opened in-app, downloaded when the field needs paper

Documents

4,431

across 9 top folders

Current revs

1,286

100% stamped

For review

4 over 7 days

Superseded

3,128

read-only, never deleted

Pushed offline

214

to 61 field devices

Folders
job scoped

CTP Lancaster LPE-01

File	Rev	Discipline	Issued	Status	Size	Uploaded by
E-101 Power Plan — Level 1.pdf	08	Electrical	07/18/26	CURRENT	4.2 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-102 Power Plan — Level 2.pdf	07	Electrical	07/09/26	CURRENT	3.9 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-111 Lighting Plan — Level 1.pdf	05	Electrical	06/24/26	CURRENT	5.1 MB	P. Okafor · E-J
E-201 Panel Schedules A-Series.pdf	09	Electrical	07/21/26	CURRENT	1.8 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-301 Grounding Plan — Yard.pdf	04	Electrical	05/30/26	CURRENT	2.6 MB	P. Okafor · E-J
E-401 Feeder Riser Diagram.pdf	06	Electrical	07/02/26	CURRENT	2.2 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-501 One-Line Diagram — 480V.pdf	12	Electrical	07/18/26	CURRENT	4.8 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-501 One-Line Diagram — 480V.pdf	11	Electrical	06/02/26	SUPERSEDED	4.7 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-502 One-Line — Standby / Gen.pdf	03	Electrical	07/24/26	FOR REVIEW	3.4 MB	D. Whitfield · E-J
E-601 Details — Cable Tray.pdf	02	Electrical	04/28/26	CURRENT	1.1 MB	M. Hale · E-J
26 05 19 Low-Voltage Conductors.pdf	B	Spec Div 26	03/11/26	CURRENT	640 KB	Turner · GC
Shermco Acceptance Test — MDB-A.pdf	R1	Test report	07/25/26	CURRENT	8.9 MB	J. Vance · Shermco
CTP-LPE01-ELEC-IFC.ifc	v4	VDC model	07/26/26	FOR REVIEW	214 MB	L. Ferreira · Lighthouse

E-501 One-Line Diagram — 480V.pdf · rev 12
CURRENTpage 1 of 5

92%

File size4.8 MB

Pages5

Uploaded byDana Whitfield · E-J Electric

Issued07/18/26

SHA-2568c41 fd07 63be 2a95 e1d8 5470 bb3c 90f6 …

Access E-J Electric Turner Lighthouse VDC CORVAL — READ ONLY

Access is company ∩ job grant. Corval left the job on 05/12/26 — they keep read-only access to exactly the revisions they held while on the job (rev 10 and earlier) and see nothing issued since. Nothing is deleted, nothing new leaks.

Version history
4 revs

Revised MDP-A feeder per RFI-21207/18/26 · Dana Whitfield

CURRENT

Added UPS-1 critical branch06/02/26 · Dana Whitfield

Issued for construction04/14/26 · Priya Okafor

Permit set02/27/26 · Priya Okafor

Linked items
4 links

RFI-212Feeder routing at column line CL-7ANSWERED

26 05 19-002LV conductors submittalAPPROVED

MDB-ASwitchboard asset · Area A1ASSET

ITP-4.2Acceptance testing & arc-flash labelsOPEN

Activity
last 48 h

Downloaded PDF (with markups) — Luis Ortega, Superintendent07/28/26 06:41 · field tablet · E-J Electric

Viewed page 1 — Robert Nguyen, PM07/28/26 05:58 · web · E-J Electric

Markup added on page 1 — Dana Whitfield, Eng PM07/27/26 16:22 · web · E-J Electric

Downloaded DWG (source) — Luis Ferreira, VDC07/27/26 11:07 · web · Lighthouse VDC

Viewed page 3 — Angela Reyes, QC07/27/26 09:35 · field tablet · Turner

Offline & push — the field never polls
61 DEVICES IN SYNC

When a rev is stamped current, the sheet, its markups and its linked ITP are pushed to every device on that area’s crew list and cached for offline use. The tablet in a slab pour with no signal already has rev 12. When it comes back on the network it re-syncs deltas only — it never polls, and it never silently shows an old rev: a superseded sheet opens with a red SUPERSEDED band until the push lands.

Pushed docs214

Devices61

Offline cache1.9 GB

Last push07/28 06:12

Stale devices2

Procore-style in the one way that matters: the document opens in place — no download-to-read. Download is there for the crew that still wants D-size paper in the gang box, and every download is logged against a person, a company and a revision.

Engineering›Digital Twin›Equipment · CTP Lancaster LPE-01

Equipment Twin 2D + 3D FROM SUBMITTALS

Every elevation on this page is drawn from the geometry and ratings extracted out of the approved submittal — not sketched. Each breaker is an addressable object: click it, read it, lock it out.

GEOMETRY FROM SUBMITTAL EXTRACTION CLICK ANY BREAKER

SELECTEDMDB-A · switchboard480Y/277 V 3Ø 4W · 4000 A · 65 kAIC · 6 sectionsSUBMITTAL26 24 13-001 rev 3 · approved 04/02/26Elevation, schedule and 3D built from the approved submittal.

RPP-2A — front elevation · dead front removed
NEMA 120″ × 5′-8″2 LOCKS APPLIED

ØA conductorØBØCEGC / bondingBus · energizedLocked out

LOTO roster — RPP-2A2 lockssame breaker object as the one-line and the Cx record

RPP-2A — panel schedule
42 CKT208Y/120 V 3Ø 4W225 A MCB

Odd circuits — left side of the bus1 – 41

CKT	TRIP	DESCRIPTION	VA	ØA	ØB	ØC
1	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU A1 — cab 01–04	1,440	1,440	·	·
3	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU A2 — cab 05–08	1,800	·	1,800	·
5	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU A3 — cab 09–12	1,100	·	·	1,100
7	30 A / 2PLOTO	CRAC-2A condensate pump	1,620	1,620	·	·
9	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	1,620	·	1,620	·
11	20 A / 1PLOTO	Recept — MER-2 north wall	720	·	·	720
13	20 A / 1PLOTO	Recept — MER-2 south wall	540	540	·	·
15	20 A / 3PLOTO	Fan coil FCU-2-06	960	·	960	·
17	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	960	·	·	960
19	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 3 —	960	960	·	·
21	20 A / 1PLOTO	BMS field panel BMS-2A	480	·	480	·
23	30 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU A4 — cab 13–16	1,600	·	·	1,600
25	20 A / 1PLOTO	Fire alarm NAC — level 2	300	300	·	·
27	20 A / 2PLOTO	Access control panel ACS-2A	540	·	540	·
29	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	540	·	·	540
31	20 A / 1PLOTO	Lighting — MER-2 + corridor	560	560	·	·
33	20 A / 1PLOTO	SPARE	·	·	·	·
35	20 A / 1PLOTO	CCTV NVR feed — level 2	320	·	·	320
37	40 A / 2PLOTO	Heat trace panel HT-2A	2,160	2,160	·	·
39	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	2,160	·	2,160	·
41	20 A / 1PLOTO	SPARE	·	·	·	·
Odd subtotal			20,380	7,580	7,560	5,240

Even circuits — right side of the bus2 – 42

CKT	TRIP	DESCRIPTION	VA	ØA	ØB	ØC
2	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU B1 — cab 17–20	1,440	1,440	·	·
4	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU B2 — cab 21–24	1,800	·	1,800	·
6	60 A / 3PLOTO	CRAC-2A compressor	4,160	·	·	4,160
8	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	4,160	4,160	·	·
10	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 3 —	4,160	·	4,160	·
12	20 A / 1PLOTO	Recept — corridor 2-14	420	·	·	420
14	20 A / 1PLOTO	Recept — IDF-2B	720	720	·	·
16	30 A / 2PLOTO	In-row cooler INR-2B	2,490	·	2,490	·
18	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	2,490	·	·	2,490
20	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU B3 — cab 25–28	1,440	1,440	·	·
22	20 A / 1PLOTO	Rack PDU B4 — cab 29–32	1,800	·	1,800	·
24	20 A / 2PLOTO	Door controller DC-2B	450	·	·	450
26	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	450	450	·	·
28	20 A / 1PLOTO	Lighting — data hall 2 row B	970	·	970	·
30	20 A / 1PLOTO	Lighting — data hall 2 row C	640	·	·	640
32	30 A / 3PLOTO	AHU-2B supply fan	2,060	2,060	·	·
34	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 2 —	2,060	·	2,060	·
36	⋮LOTO	— same device, pole 3 —	2,060	·	·	2,060
38	20 A / 1PLOTO	Recept — janitor / cleaning	300	300	·	·
40	20 A / 1PLOTO	SPARE	·	·	·	·
42	20 A / 1PLOTO	SPARE	·	·	·	·
Even subtotal			34,070	10,570	13,280	10,220

Connected load

54,450 VA

151.1 A avg per phase · 208Y/120 V 3Ø 4W

Demand load

65,088 VA

180.7 A · continuous at 125% per NEC 210.19(A)(1)

Main device

225 A

80% of main at demand · 22 kA AIC

Phase A loaded

67.2%

18,150 VA · 151.2 A of 225 A

Phase B loaded

77.2%

20,840 VA · 173.7 A of 225 A

Phase C loaded

57.3%

15,460 VA · 128.8 A of 225 A

Rows are the same objects as the handles in the elevation — clicking either one selects the other. A locked breaker is hatched here and on the drawing, and the connected VA stays in the totals so you can see what the isolation is actually taking out.

PDU-B3 — front & rear elevation
300 kVA K-13480 – 208Y/120 V36″ × 36″ × 84″

SECTION A 10″Monitoring + main input — display, 400 A input CB, SPD

SECTION B 34″Subfeed panelboards — 2 × 42 ckt, 100 A subfeeds

SECTION C 28″Transformer — 300 kVA K-13, vented, 150°C rise

SECTION D 12″Base + entry — casters, leveling feet, top & bottom entry

Tags 1–14 are the component list pulled straight out of the submittal bill of material; each one carries its own model number, serial, warranty start and Cx test record. The transformer section is drawn at its submitted 28″ — that is what forced the 1.5″ wall clearance finding on RPP-2A next door.

MDB-A — switchgear lineup, isometric
6 SECTIONS18′-0″ × 5′-2″ × 7′-10″4000 A · 65 kAIC

Close pushbuttonTrip pushbuttonBreaker closed indicationNameplate · engravedTop-entry conduit stub

Drawn from the approved shop drawing: section widths, cubicle stacking, door swings, lifting eyes, conduit stub locations and the 6″ housekeeping pad from S-401. Every cubicle in this lineup is the same kind of object as a breaker in RPP-2A — 52-M, 52-T and the twelve feeder devices all carry their own LOTO state, trip settings, and Cx record.

Submittal vision — is it built the way it was approved?
2 FAIL1 WARN5 PASS

SUBMITTAL — approved record→MODEL — what we drew→INSTALLED — what is on the wall

Source submittal

26 24 16-003 rev 2 — Square D NQ panelboard, approved 05/12/26 by Halvorsen + Kee, stamped “approved as noted”

Shop drawing sheet

Sheet E-2 of 6 — panel schedule + front elevation, received 04/28/26, 14 days in review

Extracted geometry

20″ W × 5′-8″ H × 5-3/4″ D NEMA 1, copper bus, 1″ pole spacing, 42 pole spaces

Extracted ratings

225 A main circuit breaker · 22 kA AIC · 208Y/120 V 3Ø 4W, fed from MDB-A CKT 12

Extracted schedule

42 circuits — 34 loads, 4 spares, 4 multi-pole devices, every row parsed with its trip, poles, VA and description

Field evidence

Install photos 06/22 + 06/30, laser scan 06/18, torque log, power quality capture 07/24

ID	Result	Check	Finding	Owner
EQ-01	FAIL	Breaker schedule vs approved submittalevery pole compared to the extracted schedule	CKT 23 is a 30 A 1-pole; the approved submittal and the contract schedule both show 20 A. The branch run is #12 AWG, which NEC 240.4(D)(5) will not let you protect above 20 A. Installed device photographed 06/22, model QO130 — approved device was QO120.	J. Okafor · EOR
EQ-02	PASS	AIC rating vs available fault currentdevice withstand vs study rev 4	Panel is 22 kA fully rated. Available fault current at the RPP-2A line terminals is 18.2 kA per the SKM study rev 4 issued 05/28/26. Field label printed and applied.	auto · study feed
EQ-03	PASS	Feeder conductor size vs main breaker225 A main, 75°C terminations	Feeder 4 × #4/0 Cu + #4 Cu EGC in 2″ RGS from MDB-A CKT 12. #4/0 at 75°C = 230 A ≥ 225 A. Conduit fill 34%. Matches submittal riser detail.	auto · model
EQ-04	WARN	Panel dimensions vs available wallsubmittal envelope vs as-built MER-2 pocket	Panel is 20″ wide plus 3″ trim into a 24.5″ masonry pocket — 1.5″ total side clearance. It fits, but there is no room for the 30″ wide trim shown on the alternate submittal, and the door needs 110° to clear the conduit rack.	S. Whitlock · PM
EQ-05	FAIL	Phase balance within 10%NEC 220 / owner standard SPEC-26-05	Connected imbalance is 14.8% — ØA 151.2 A, ØB 173.7 A, ØC 128.8 A. Driver is CKT 6 (CRAC-2A compressor, 12.5 kVA) landing on the same legs as the row-B rack PDUs. Rebalancing CKT 20 and CKT 22 to ØC brings it to 6.1%.	D. Reyes · foreman
EQ-06	PASS	Circuit directory legibility — NEC 408.4(A)directory vs installed condition	Typed directory in the door holder, 42 of 42 circuits described by use and location, no circuit left as “spare” where a load is connected. Directory regenerated from this schedule on 07/24 and re-printed.	auto · twin
EQ-07	PASS	Grounding & bonding — NEC 250.122EGC size per overcurrent device	#12 Cu EGC on every 20 A branch, #10 on the 30 A, #8 on the 40 A heat trace. Main bonding jumper removed at RPP-2A (system bonded at PDU-B3 only). Ground bar PK15GTA installed and torqued, witnessed 06/30.	auto · model
EQ-08	PASS	Working clearance — NFPA 70E 110.26condition 1, 208 V to ground	36″ depth required, 36.5″ measured to the cable tray leg by laser scan 06/18/26. Width 30″ clear, headroom 6′-6″. Floor marked and the equipment label applied.	auto · scan

The submittal is the approved record. The model is checked against the submittal, the installed condition is checked against both, and every disagreement is a finding that a named human has to clear — not a silently overwritten field. Nothing here auto-corrects: EQ-01 stays open until either the 20 A device is installed or the EOR approves the 30 A with a conductor upsize, and the twin keeps showing both the approved value and the installed value side by side until that happens.

Why this is one object and not three drawings. The equipment geometry and the ratings on this page came out of submittal extraction — enclosure size, bus rating, AIC, pole spacing, the 42-row schedule, the section widths of the lineup. Each breaker is an addressable object with its own identity, so it can be locked out individually and show up on the LOTO roster by lock number and by person. The panel schedule, the one-line, the LOTO isolation and the Cx record all reference that same breaker object rather than three copies of it — which is why changing CKT 23 from 20 A to 30 A produced one finding here instead of a schedule that quietly disagrees with a drawing that quietly disagrees with the tag on the wall.

Field›Displays›TV Boards · NOC

TV Boards · NOC PUSH ONLY

Wall boards you leave up 24/7 — trailers, gate kiosks, electrical rooms, the owner's office. Every tile is pushed from the server the moment the underlying record changes; nothing on this page polls — CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · Turner (GC) · E-J Electric

14 displays online · SSE push

CASTING TO · TRAILER 1 GC CONFERENCE · 3840×2160

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Safety LIVE · PUSHED 2s AGO 14:52

ACTIVE CRANE SWING — ZONE C

Column lines 12–16 · LR1600 crawler · pick 4 of 6, generator skid to pad G-2 · no work under the load, no entry from the east ramp

28:14

zone clears 15:20

DAYS WITHOUT RECORDABLE

214

Last recordable 22 Dec 2025 · 1.28M craft hours · TRIR 0.31

Crane swing — Zone C

Col 12–16 · barricaded 60 ft · signal person on ch. 4

ACTIVE

UNTIL 15:20

Energization — MDB-B switchgear

Level 2 electrical room · 20 ft arc-flash boundary · E-J Electric

14:00

IN 68 MIN

Sprinkler pressurization — L2 east

Zone 2E dry system to 175 psi · Harrell Fire Protection

15:30

CLEAR CEILINGS

HEADCOUNT ON SITE — BADGED IN

E-J Electric

142

Southland Mech.

Turner (GC)

Ferrovial civil

Harrell FP

283ON SITE · 6 COMPANIES

PERMITS OPEN TODAY

HOT WORK

ENERGIZED

CONFINED

CRANE PICK

EXCAVATION

JHA SIGNED

SAFETY MESSAGE

Stop-work authority belongs to every worker on this site — any company, any time, no retaliation. Call it on channel 1.

MESSAGE 1 OF 5 · ROTATES EVERY 20s

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Commissioning & turnover LIVE · PUSHED 6s AGO 14:52

CX COMPLETE

61%

47 of 77 systems · +4 this week

QA / QC CHECKS

74%

3,112 of 4,205 · 61 open NCRs

ITP HOLD POINTS

88%

Witnessed & released · 5 awaiting owner

TURNOVER READY

34%

Packages A1–A4 · 9 of 26 assembled

SYSTEMS ENERGIZED THIS WEEK

MDB-A main switchboard

4000 A · E-J Electric · witnessed by CTP + Turner

MON 14:20

UPS-1A modules 1–4

1.2 MW · battery string proved · ITP-6.1 released

TUE 09:05

PDU-A11 / A12

Data hall 1 · 42 branch circuits · phase rotation verified

TUE 16:40

CHW pump P-3 VFD

Southland Mechanical · bump test & rotation with E-J

WED 11:15

Fire pump controller FP-1

Harrell FP · AHJ witness scheduled Fri 08:00

THU 07:50

TURNOVER PACKAGE A1 — DUE OCT 14

DAYS REMAINING

Data hall 1 electrical · 214 of 318 documents assembled · 5 ITP releases outstanding · owner review opens Sep 22

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Schedule & look-ahead LIVE · PUSHED 11s AGO 14:52

THIS WEEK — CRITICAL PATH ACTIVITIES · WK 31

MDB-B feeder pull & terminate

E-J Electric · L2 electrical room · due Fri 01 Aug

78%

Busway riser B — L1 to L3

E-J Electric · crane pick 4 today · due Mon 04 Aug

45%

Gen pad duct bank 4

Ferrovial civil · yard, east of gate 2 · due Thu 31 Jul

62%

CRAH power drops rows 7–9

Southland + E-J · data hall 1 · due Wed 06 Aug

30%

Fire alarm device trim — L2

Harrell FP · ceilings close behind · due Tue 05 Aug

55%

MANPOWER BY DAY — ALL COMPANIES

268MON

283TUE

291WED

277THU

262FRI

96SAT

−6

DAYS FLOAT · CRITICAL PATH

Driver: busway riser B → MDB-B energization → data hall 1 load bank · recovery plan issued 25 Jul

14 Nov

contract substantial completion

WEEK 32 04–08 AUG

Busway riser B complete · MDB-B energization + load bank prep · CRAH drops rows 7–9 · duct bank 4 backfill

WEEK 33 11–15 AUG

Data hall 1 load bank 1.5 MW · PDU-A13/A14 energize · fire alarm verification L2 · A1 package walkdown

WEEK 34 18–22 AUG

Generator 1&2 first start · ATS transfer test · L3 rough-in start · owner Cx witness window

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Energization & LOTO LIVE · PUSHED 1s AGO 14:52

ACTIVE ISOLATIONS RIGHT NOW

Every lock traced to a badge · 3 group lock boxes · 9 companies represented on the isolations

17LOCKS APPLIED

24SIGNED ON

2GATES HELD

LOTO-034 — MDB-B tie breaker

E-J Electric · 7 locks · gate held: crane pick 4 in the room above

HELD

LOTO-031 — MDB-A tie breaker

E-J Electric · 6 locks · gate held: ITP-4.2 owner witness

HELD

LOTO-033 — CHW pump P-3

Southland Mechanical · 4 locks · zero-energy verified 11:02

CLEAR

Next energization — MDB-B switchgear

Level 2 electrical room · 20 ft boundary · 6 people on the permit

14:00

Zero-energy verifications today

Meters proved before and after every test · last at 11:02

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Production & manpower LIVE · PUSHED 4s AGO 14:52

CONDUIT INSTALLED TODAY · LF

2,480

Plan 2,200 LF · reported from 11 foreman tablets as the work happened, no paper, no end-of-day catch-up

+13%VS DAILY CURVE

11CREWS REPORTING

96%REPORTED BY 15:00

Cable pulled — week to date

Feeders + branch · MDB-B riser and data hall 1

14,900 ft

Terminations today

PDU-A13/A14 panels · 4 crews · QC punch walked same day

612

Prefab racks delivered from shop

E-J prefab shop · 38 racks staged on L2 · 6 remaining in queue

Crew on site · 6 companies

E-J 142 · Southland 61 · Turner 38 · Ferrovial 24 · Harrell 18

283

Rework tags opened today

Both closed same shift · PDU-A13 branch labeling · 41 closed this week

CTP LANCASTER · LPE-01 Executive LIVE · PUSHED 9s AGO 14:52

SCOPE COMPLETE — LPE-01 ELECTRICAL

68%

Earned against the resource-loaded schedule · no cost, no margin, no rates on this board

108DAYS TO SUBSTANTIAL

26TURNOVER PACKAGES

77SYSTEMS IN SCOPE

Schedule float — critical path

Busway riser B → MDB-B energization · recovery plan issued 25 Jul

−6 d

Commissioning complete

47 of 77 systems · turnover package A1 due 14 Oct

61%

Days without a recordable

1.28M craft hours · TRIR 0.31 · 6 companies

214

Open RFIs & submittals

23 RFIs open, 4 aged past 14 days · 11 submittals in owner review

23 / 11

Manpower on site today

6 companies · peak plan 310 in week 34 · second riser crew added Sat

283

VELORIN BOARD RUNTIME · DISPLAY 03 · TRAILER 1 — GC CONFERENCE

AUTO-ROTATION Safety 30s → Cx / turnover 30s → Schedule 20s Next board — Cx / turnover in 12s

Display management
14 DISPLAYSALL PUSH14 ONLINE

Location	Board assigned	Orientation	Last heartbeat	Status
Trailer 1 — GC conferenceTurner · 65″ wall mount	Executive	LANDSCAPE 4K	1s ago	LIVE
Trailer 1 — corridorTurner · 55″	Safety	LANDSCAPE 4K	2s ago	LIVE
E-J trailer — main roomE-J Electric · 75″	Schedule & look-ahead	LANDSCAPE 4K	1s ago	LIVE
E-J trailer — foreman roomE-J Electric · 50″	Production & manpower	LANDSCAPE HD	3s ago	LIVE
Gate 2 kioskBadge-in turnstile · 43″	Safety	PORTRAIT HD	1s ago	LIVE
Gate 4 kioskNorth laydown · 43″	Safety	PORTRAIT HD	4s ago	LIVE
Level 2 electrical roomRuggedised · 32″	Energization & LOTO	LANDSCAPE HD	2s ago	LIVE
Level 3 electrical roomRuggedised · 32″	Energization & LOTO	LANDSCAPE HD	14s ago	REPLAYING · SEQ 4,812,219
Data hall 1 — north wallTurner · 86″	Commissioning / turnover	LANDSCAPE 4K	2s ago	LIVE
Prefab shop floorE-J prefab · 65″	Production & manpower	LANDSCAPE 4K	3s ago	LIVE
Owner's office — CTPCTP Lancaster · 55″	Executive	LANDSCAPE 4K	1s ago	LIVE
Owner's office — lobbyCTP Lancaster · 49″	Commissioning / turnover	PORTRAIT 4K	2s ago	LIVE
Southland trailerSouthland Mechanical · 55″	Schedule & look-ahead	LANDSCAPE HD	5s ago	LIVE
Warehouse — receivingTurner · 43″	Production & manpower	PORTRAIT HD	2s ago	LIVE

Live — stream open, deltas arriving Replaying — reconnected, catching up from last sequence number Boards are read-only. A display can never edit a record.

Add a display
NO ACCOUNT NEEDED

LPE-01 · 4K7M-2Q

1Point any phone camera, tablet or smart-TV browser at the code. It opens a view-only board session — no login, no invite, no app.

2Name the display (“Gate 2 kiosk”) and pick a board. Orientation is detected; the code expires in 10 minutes.

3The display opens a persistent stream and stays current. If it loses signal it replays from its last sequence number when it comes back.

The join token is scoped to one board and one company's visibility. A display in the E-J trailer cannot be pointed at a board carrying another subcontractor's private data, and no display token can write anything back.

Push architecture — how a board stays current
SSE / WEBSOCKETSERVER-INITIATED

180 ms

Median push latency

420 ms

p95 push latency

Subscribed devices

Dropped events / 24 h

Connections are server-initiated and persistent. When a record changes, the delta is on every subscribed screen in about 200 ms — the board you are looking at is never more than one push behind the field. A display that drops off reconnects and replays every missed event from its sequence number, so it can never sit quietly showing yesterday.

~~webhooks~~ ~~polling~~ ~~refresh buttons~~

Boards are read-only and deliberately cost-free. No contract value, no change-order pricing, no labor rates, no margin — nothing on a TV board is money. That is what makes it safe to hang one in a shared trailer, a gate kiosk or a corridor where six companies walk past it all day. Every board is also scoped: a display joined by E-J Electric sees E-J's manpower, E-J's permits and the shared job facts, and never another subcontractor's private detail. Owner-side displays get the owner's view. The board is a window onto the same live records everyone else is working from — pushed, never polled — not a separate report someone has to remember to update.

Field›Model›Site Walk · 3D

Site Walk · 3D MODEL SOURCE —

Drive the building the way you'd drive a game — hold left to look, hold right to move, scroll to close in. Each box is a model element from the IFC export, coloured by trade and contractor. Asset records are not linked to these elements yet, and no commissioning status is loaded.

last ingest —

— WALK · EYE 5'-6"

Model — GRID A–H / 1–8 SOFTWARE RENDER

NS EW

000°

HEADING

LEVEL

GRID REFERENCE

D-2

E 80.0 / N 20.0

EL. +5'-6" · GROUND

RENDER

— ms · — faces

L1 — installed L2 — static checks L3 — energized / functional L4 — integrated systems test L5 — accepted / turned over

Cx stage legend — color doctrine —

L1 · RED

Installed & checked in. No power, no static test yet.

L2 · YELLOW

Static checks complete — megger, torque, alignment.

L3 · GREEN

Energized, start-up done, functional test signed.

L4 · BLUE

Integrated systems test passed as part of a block.

L5 · WHITE

Accepted by the owner. Turned over, under their control.

The color on the box is the Cx stage — nothing else. Walk the room and you are reading the turnover package in real time: red is still just steel and copper, white belongs to the owner. Structure — slab, columns, walls, fence — is drawn neutral gray so it never competes with equipment status.

Controls GAME-STYLE

Hold LEFT & drag — turn your headYaw left/right, pitch up/down. Nothing moves, you just look.

Hold RIGHT & drag — drivePush away to walk forward, pull back to reverse, sideways to strafe.

Scroll wheel — zoomRides straight down the view vector, in and out, exactly like Diablo IV.

Keyboard also worksWASD drive · QE down/up · ←↑↓→ look. Click the viewport first.

Hover to inspect, click to pinWhatever is under the cursor lights up and fills the panel. Click again to release.

Same model, three camerasPLAN drops to a top-down sheet, ISO locks a 45° corner, WALK puts you on the slab at eye height. The camera flies between them.

Follows you on every map and model — the same camera rig, the same color doctrine, whether you're standing in a data hall, a substation yard or a 40-storey riser.

Under the crosshair HOVER

Stage mix — this level

Model facts

Renderersoftware / 2D canvas

Solids—

Faces drawn—

Frame budget—

Column gridA–H / 1–8 @ 20'-0"

Slab160' × 160'

Camera state is held per screen. Leave the tab and the loop stops dead — no frames are drawn while you're on another screen.

Field›Schedule›Job Tracker · daily progress

Job Tracker FOREMAN + PM DAILY BOARD

One board, two readers. The foreman touches a number for every activity in the areas he was given — the PM watches those numbers land against the schedule and gets told, the same day, where the job is slipping. CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · Turner (GC) · Wednesday 29 July 2026.

synced 4 min ago P6 baseline REV 14

Signed in as

Ray Delacruz

Foreman · E-J Electric · Areas A1 / A3 / A5

Tasks on your board

today · assigned areas

Reported complete

stamped actual finish

Avg % complete

49%

against 70% planned

Can’t start

1 delay notice drafting

Areas flagged

1 behind · 2 watch

Today’s tasks — report how far you got 5 ACTIVITIES WED 29 JUL

source · P6 activity codes areas from column-line map

Big buttons, gloves on. Tap a percent or drag the bar. Hit COMPLETE when it is done and the actual dates stamp themselves. If you can’t start it, say why — that is what writes the delay notice.

E-2140 Feeder pull SWBD-2A to PDU-14, 4 sets 500 kcmil E-J Electric COMPLETE

Area · column line

AREA 3 · GRID C4-E6 · LEVEL 2

Planned start

07/24

Planned finish

07/29

Actual

07/24 06:30 → 07/28 14:12

Crew

4 · Delacruz, Voss, Ryan P, Ibarra

Manhours today

32 MH

100%

actual plan 100%

E-2155 Branch conduit rough-in above ceiling grid, Hall 01 E-J Electric BEHIND

Area · column line

AREA 3 · GRID E6-G8 · LEVEL 2

Planned start

07/22

Planned finish

07/30

Actual

07/22 06:30 → —

Crew

6 · Ryan P + 5

Manhours today

48 MH

45%

actual plan 78%

E-2162 Busway hanger set, rows 3-4 over CRAH line E-J Electric IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 5 · GRID H2-K5 · LEVEL 1

Planned start

07/28

Planned finish

08/04

Actual

07/28 06:30 → —

Crew

3 · Ibarra + 2

Manhours today

24 MH

25%

actual plan 12%

E-2171 PDU-16 set and secondary terminations E-J Electric CAN’T START

Area · column line

AREA 5 · GRID K5-M7 · LEVEL 1

Planned start

07/29 — today

Planned finish

08/06

Actual

—

Crew

2 · Voss, Okafor

Manhours today

16 MH idle

actual plan 0%

Can’t start — E-2171 · scheduled to start today reported 06:41 by R. Delacruz

Why can’t you start pick one

Tell V why plain words — V writes the notice

V read this, matched it to activity C-1104 (Corval housekeeping pads) and picked the contract clause for you.

Photos 3 attached

IMG_4471 pad

IMG_4472 rebar

IMG_4473 grid K5

What gets sent up the chain auto-drafted

Delay notice DN-042 — PDU-16 set, Area 5 DRAFT

41h 19m left to serve written notice. Subcontract Art. 8.3.2 — 48 hours from first day of impact. First impact stamped 07/29 06:41, notice due 07/31 06:41. Miss it and the time is not recoverable.

Routes to

R. DelacruzForeman · E-J R. NguyenPM · E-J TurnerGC · issue for signature

Schedule activities hit float consumed

Activity	Description	Float	Consumed	Effect
E-2171	PDU-16 set & secondary terms	4 d	3 d	1 d LEFT
E-2188	PDU-16 energize & load bank	4 d	3 d	1 d LEFT
E-2205	Hall 01 integrated systems test	0 d	3 d	CRITICAL PATH

Predecessor is C-1104 Corval housekeeping pads — not E-J’s scope, so the notice is written as an impact caused by others.

E-2183 Cable tray main run, north gallery E-J Electric IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 1 · GRID A1-C3 · LEVEL 2

Planned start

07/25

Planned finish

08/01

Actual

07/25 06:30 → —

Crew

5 · Okafor + 4

Manhours today

40 MH

75%

actual plan 71%

L-0412 Site lighting bases and conduit, east drive Lighthouse Electric IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 7 · EXT E1-E9 · GRADE

Planned start

07/27

Planned finish

07/31

Actual

07/27 07:00 → —

Crew

3 · Kowalczyk + 2

Manhours today

24 MH

50%

actual plan 44%

L-0428 Core & shell distribution MDP-C rough-in Lighthouse Electric IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 2 · GRID B2-D4 · LEVEL 1

Planned start

07/24

Planned finish

08/03

Actual

07/24 07:00 → —

Crew

4 · Brennan + 3

Manhours today

32 MH

60%

actual plan 62%

L-0435 Lightning protection air terminals, roof bay 2 Lighthouse Electric CAN’T START

Area · column line

AREA 4 · GRID F1-J4 · ROOF

Planned start

07/28

Planned finish

08/07

Actual

07/28 07:00 → —

Crew

2 · Sipes, Marr

Manhours today

16 MH

Reported

Weather — DN-041 sent

25%

actual plan 33%

Can’t start — L-0435 · roof work suspended reported 07/28 09:12 by D. Kowalczyk

Why can’t you start pick one

Tell V why

V pulled the NOAA station record for Lancaster and attached it as the weather-day evidence.

What got sent

Delay notice DN-041 — roof LPS, Area 4 SUBMITTED

18h to spare. Served 07/28 15:40, inside the 48 hour window. Turner acknowledged 07/29 07:02. Weather day logged against the contract calendar.

Schedule activities hit float consumed

Activity	Description	Float	Consumed	Effect
L-0435	Roof LPS air terminals bay 2	9 d	2 d	7 d LEFT
L-0451	Roof LPS down conductors	9 d	2 d	NO IMPACT

F-1180 Sprinkler branch drops, Data Hall 01 ATS Fire IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 3 · GRID C4-E6 · LEVEL 2

Planned start

07/26

Planned finish

08/02

Actual

07/26 06:45 → —

Crew

4 · Pella + 3

Manhours today

32 MH

50%

actual plan 50%

M-3320 CRAH condensate and chilled water piping, row 5 Corval IN PROGRESS

Area · column line

AREA 5 · GRID H2-K5 · LEVEL 1

Planned start

07/23

Planned finish

07/30

Actual

07/23 06:30 → —

Crew

5 · Tarrant + 4

Manhours today

40 MH

70%

actual plan 71%

A foreman only sees rows his company owns. Ray is signed in for E-J Electric, so Lighthouse’s core-and-shell work, ATS Fire’s sprinkler and Corval’s piping are not on his list even though they are in the same rooms on the same day. Switch to Turner above to see every company at once — that is the GC’s view and nobody else’s.

Area status — planned against actual, by column line rolls up live from the board

Area 1 · North gallery

GRID A1-C3 · LEVEL 2

ON TRACK

75% planned 72% +2 d

manpower 5 → 7
5-day trend

Area 2 · Core & shell

GRID B2-D4 · LEVEL 1

ON TRACK

60% planned 62% −1 d

manpower 4 → 4
5-day trend

Area 3 · Data Hall 01

GRID C4-G8 · LEVEL 2

BEHIND

65% planned 82% −9 d

manpower 12 → 10
5-day trend

Area 4 · Roof / LPS

GRID F1-J4 · ROOF

WATCH

25% planned 33% −5 d

manpower 4 → 2
weather days ×2

Area 5 · Data Hall 02

GRID H2-M7 · LEVEL 1

WATCH

32% planned 38% −4 d

manpower 10 → 8
2 idle on E-2171

Area 7 · Site / exterior

EXT E1-E9 · GRADE

ON TRACK

50% planned 44% +3 d

manpower 3 → 3
5-day trend

On track — 2 days behind or better Watch — 3 to 7 days behind Behind — more than 7 days Tick mark on the bar is the planned percent for today

Area 3 is the one to look at. Every company in that room is at or ahead of plan except E-2155 branch rough-in, which is sitting at 45% against 78% planned and dragging the whole area to nine days behind. The flag came from the foreman’s own thumb this morning — nobody had to run a schedule update to find it.

How this board is wired contract · division · scope matrix

SOURCE 1 — DEFAULT

CSI division mapping

Used when no scope matrix exists. Each division on the contract is mapped to the company holding it.

21Fire suppressionATS Fire

22PlumbingKeystone Plumbing

23HVAC / mechanicalCorval

26ElectricalE-J + Lighthouse — SPLIT

27CommunicationsE-J Electric

28Electronic safetyATS Fire

DIVISION 26 IS AMBIGUOUS ON ITS OWN

SOURCE 2 — OVERRIDE

Uploaded scope matrix

Drop the matrix the GC or the estimator issued. It wins over the division default, item by item.

Drop a scope matrix XLSX, CSV or a PDF exhibit · V reads the grid

CTP-LPE-01 Scope Matrix Rev C

uploaded 07/21/2026 by Turner

142 scope lines · 5 companies parsed

1 split line flagged for confirmation

MATRIX OVERRIDES THE DIVISION DEFAULT

RESULT

Resolved wiring

Every P6 activity gets an owner company, and every foreman gets the subset for the areas he was assigned.

418activitiesE-J Electric

276activitiesLighthouse Electric

131activitiesATS Fire

204activitiesCorval

88activitiesKeystone Plumbing

0unownednothing orphaned

1,117 ACTIVITIES WIRED, NONE RE-KEYED

Scope matrix CTP-LPE-01 Rev C · who owns what

Scope item	E-JPOWER / SYSTEMS	LIGHTHOUSECORE & SHELL	ATS FIREDIV 21 / 28	CORVALDIV 23	KEYSTONEDIV 22	Basis
26 05 00 Basic electrical materials & methods	SPLIT	SPLIT				SPLIT Matrix Rev C — Lighthouse to the line side of MSB-1, E-J everything downstream. Confirmed by RFI-208.
26 05 19 Low-voltage conductors & cables	OWNS					Matrix Rev C
26 05 33 Raceways & boxes, core and shell		OWNS				Matrix Rev C — shell walls, slab and exterior only
26 24 16 Panelboards	OWNS					Matrix Rev C
26 41 00 Lightning protection		OWNS				CO-026 added to Lighthouse 07/21 — was owner-direct
27 15 00 Communications horizontal cabling	OWNS					Division default — no matrix line
28 31 00 Fire detection & alarm			OWNS			CO-021 moved from E-J 07/03
21 13 00 Wet-pipe sprinkler systems			OWNS			Division default
22 11 00 Facility domestic water distribution					OWNS	Division default — plumber wired with no matrix line
23 21 00 Hydronic piping & pumps				OWNS		Matrix Rev C

Change orders that re-wired the board 3 since award

CO-014 06/12/2026 REV B → C

MSB-1 through PDU feeders moved from Lighthouse to E-J

42 activities reassigned appeared on R. Delacruz list dropped off D. Kowalczyk list areas A3 / A5 value +$1.24M to E-J

CO-021 07/03/2026 SCOPE OUT

Fire alarm devices and wiring (28 31 00) moved from E-J to ATS Fire

18 activities reassigned vanished from E-J boards overnight areas A1 / A3 progress history moved with them value −$410K from E-J

CO-026 07/21/2026 NEW SCOPE

Roof lightning protection (26 41 00) added to Lighthouse — previously owner-direct

9 new activities created wired to Lighthouse on upload area A4 created on the board L-0435 on today’s list is one of them

The doctrine, in one line each. A foreman only ever sees the tasks his company owns — never another sub’s, even in the same room on the same day. Ownership comes from the scope matrix when one exists, and from the CSI division mapping when it does not, so a plumber with no matrix is still wired correctly off Division 22 the day he is added. A change order re-wires it, and the board updates itself — activities move companies, tasks appear and disappear from the right foreman’s list, progress history travels with the scope, and nobody re-keys a single task.

PM daily task board

64%

Robert NguyenPM

DayWed 07/29

Tasks reported16 / 25

Reports in by 16:0021 / 25

Completion by company

E-J6 / 9

Lighthouse4 / 7

ATS Fire2 / 3

Corval3 / 4

Keystone1 / 2

Manpower on site vs planned

On site74

Planned82

Gap−8

E-J28 / 31

Lighthouse15 / 18

ATS Fire9 / 9

Corval17 / 18

Keystone5 / 6

Idle on blocked work4

Needs the PM today

1 delay notice to issueDN-042 PDU-16 — drafted, needs your signature and goes to Turner. 41h left on the 48-hour clock.

2 can’t-starts reportedE-2171 prior trade (Corval pads) · L-0435 weather, already served.

1 area flagged behindArea 3 Data Hall 01 at 9 days. E-2155 branch rough-in is the driver.

4 reports outstandingKeystone and 3 E-J rows not yet touched at 15:20.

V suggests for tomorrow

Move Voss and Okafor off the blocked PDU-16 set to E-2155 branch rough-in in Area 3. That is the activity dragging the area to nine days and they are already badged for Level 2.

Add 2 to Area 3 from the Area 1 tray crew. Area 1 is +2 days and can give them up for three shifts without slipping.

Hold the roof LPS crew at 2. Wind forecast is 22 mph gusting 34 through Friday — a bigger crew just books more idle time.

Push Corval for the PDU-16 housekeeping pads at the 07:00 coordination meeting. Pour plus cure is 3 days, which is exactly the float E-2205 has left.

Collaboration›Suite›VMeet · VChat · VMail · VTranslate

Collaboration Suite ONE JOB RECORD

Meetings, messaging, mail and translation that all write to the same job record. Prebuilt meeting templates with real agendas for data centers, hospitals, commercial and industrial plants — turn one into a recurring series, and every open action item rolls forward onto the next occurrence by itself. CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · GC Turner · E-J Electric · Lighthouse Electric core-and-shell.

OAC Weekly starts in 18h 148 badged · 63 non-EN locale

JOB · LPE-01 EVERYTHING FILED TO THE JOB RECORD

MEETING TEMPLATES

prebuilt across 4 facility types

SERIES RUNNING · LPE-01

next occurrence in 18h

OPEN ACTION ITEMS

6 past due

AUTO-CARRIED THIS WEEK

0 retyped by hand

LIVE CAPTION MINUTES

2,140

translated into 4 languages

Meeting template library PREBUILTEDITABLE

Every template ships with its agenda, its time-boxes, and the roles that belong in the room — SMEs, OICs, CxA, EOR, infection prevention, operations. Pick one, adjust it, and turn it into a series. Click a card to open its agenda.

DATA CENTER8 templates

HOSPITAL4 templates

GENERAL COMMERCIAL4 templates

INDUSTRIAL PLANT3 templates

Agenda —

—

Time-boxes are real. The sum of the item time-boxes is compared with the scheduled duration; if the agenda is over-stuffed Velorin flags it before the invite goes out rather than at minute 58.

Create series RECURRENCE

Repeats Weekly

Every 1 week

MTW TF

Time 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM

Starts 28 Apr 2026

Ends After 26 occurrences

Location Turner trailer Conf. A + bridge

Distribution Job record + attendees

Carry open action items forward. Any item still open at the end of an occurrence is inserted at the top of the next agenda automatically.

Copy attendees to every occurrence. Role-based, so when a company swaps a superintendent the seat follows the role.

Agenda template locks the standing items. Individual occurrences can add items but cannot delete a standing item without a reason.

Auto-generate minutes from live captions and translate the distribution copy into each recipient's language preference.

Create series Save as template Occurrences generate 4 weeks ahead · edits apply to this and following or all

Series behave the way a Procore recurring meeting behaves: one template, many occurrences, each occurrence holding its own minutes and attendance while the agenda skeleton and the attendee roster stay attached to the series. Editing an occurrence asks whether the change applies to this occurrence only, this and following, or the whole series.

Action items that roll forward AUTO-CARRY ON

Item	Description	Owner	Due	Status	Age	Meetings carried

The rule: an open action item is never re-typed. When an occurrence closes, every item still open is inserted at the top of the next occurrence's agenda automatically, carrying its item number, its owner, its original due date, its age in days, and the number of meetings it has carried. An item that has carried three meetings is visible as a problem without anybody having to remember it. Closing an item in any meeting closes it everywhere — the item lives in the job record, not in a document.

Meeting record —DISTRIBUTED

MINUTES CAPTURED

DECISIONS LOG

DISTRIBUTION

PDFEMAIL VIA VMAIL POSTED TO JOB RECORDES / PT TRANSLATION

Attendees

Next occurrence

Scheduled—

Occurrence—

Duration—

Agenda items—

Carried in—

Agenda time-boxed at — of the scheduled window

Meeting language

Floor languageEnglish

Live captionsON

Translated toES · PT · PL · HT

GlossaryElectrical · Cx

Captions run through VTranslate with the controlled construction glossary applied, so megger, hold point and LOTO come out as the pinned term rather than a literal translation.

What the series owns

Agenda skeletonseries

Attendee rosterseries

Minutesoccurrence

Attendanceoccurrence

Action itemsjob record

Decisionsjob record

Channels

JOB · CTP LANCASTER LPE-01

BY AREA

CONTROLLED

BY COMPANY

DIRECT MESSAGES

#area-3-electrical 23 members · 6 companies 14 online

AUTO TRANSLATION MY LANGUAGE · EN glossary: ELECTRICAL + CX

Dana WhitfieldTURNER06:42

Area 3 is yours from 7 to 3 today. Drywall pulled out of the east half so you have the whole run at Grid E through H.

Marcus RuizE-J ELECTRIC06:48

Copy. I have eight on branch circuit rough-in and four on the tray above Data Hall 02. We will megger PDU-1A feeders this afternoon if the panel is dressed out by noon.

José AlvaradoE-J ELECTRIC ES07:05

AUTO-TRANSLATED ES → EN

Meredith KangTURNER07:11

Labels printed yesterday, they are in the trailer on the plan table. Panel schedule is the one from the 22 Jul revision, not the one in the conex.

E-401-R3_PDU-1A_panel-schedule.pdf 2.4 MB · rev 3 · current in job record

Kevin O'DohertyLIGHTHOUSE ELECTRIC07:34

Heads up, core and shell crew is coring at Grid H today between 9 and 11. Nobody on the deck above the corridor during that window.

Luis FerreiraLIGHTHOUSE ELECTRIC ES07:41

AUTO-TRANSLATED ES → EN · hold point pinned to glossary

Priya RamanJACOBS · CxA08:02

Confirming the hold point at Grid H stays open. I witness at 13:00 today. Do not close the wall before that — if it closes I will have it opened.

Dana WhitfieldTURNER08:19

Raising this one against the wall assembly at Grid H so it does not get lost in the thread.

Punch item PL-0288 — wall assembly closed before CxA witness · Grid H-4 · open

Marcus RuizE-J ELECTRIC08:26

Understood. Wall stays open, I moved my two guys to the tray run instead. José has the labels.

Aaron SteinmetzCTP · OIC09:58

Reminder for everyone in this channel: the switching window Friday night is a controlled event. Nothing goes on #loto-live except from the lock holder and operations.

Message #area-3-electrical — typed in your language, delivered in theirs AUTO-TRANSLATE ON

Language preferences

JAJosé AlvaradoE-J ElectricES

LFLuis FerreiraLighthouse ElectricES

WKWojciech KaminskiSouthlandPL

JBJean-Baptiste PierreACR DrywallHT

MRMarcus RuizE-J ElectricEN

Each person sets their own language once. Everyone types in their language and reads in their language — nobody is asked to work in a second language to be understood.

Presence

On site · badged in14

Remote6

Away3

Companies in channel6

Presence follows the badge reader, not the app. Somebody showing on site is actually on site.

Controlled channels

#loto-livelock holder only

#cx-witnessCxA + owner

#switching-windowOIC gated

Controlled channels are read-only for everyone except the named role. Everything posted in them lands in the job record and cannot be edited or deleted after the fact.

Job mailbox

CTP LANCASTER LPE-01

OTHER JOBS

Mail sent from Velorin is addressed to people, but filed to the job. Nothing lives only in one person's Outlook.

Threads PROJECT-SCOPED

RE: RFI-0142 — PDU-1A / 1B feeder schedule conflict on E-401 RFI-0142 SUB-03616 MESSAGES

RM Rahul MenonSyska Hennessy · Electrical Engineer of Record Today 08:14

Bill, Alicia —

Confirming what we agreed in the OAC on Tuesday. The feeder schedule conflict between sheet E-401 and the PDU-1A / PDU-1B one-line is a drawing error on our side, not a field condition. We will correct it by reissuing E-401 at revision 3 rather than answering it as an RFI, because the same error appears in three other places on the sheet.

E-401 R3 will be issued 31 Jul. Please treat RFI-0142 as superseded on issue. E-J should not order the feeders against the R2 schedule — conductor sizes change on four circuits.

Rahul Menon, PE
Syska Hennessy Group

Linked to RFI-0142 Linked to drawing E-401 Linked to DEC-0071

BP Bill PetroskyE-J Electric · Project Manager Today 08:41

Understood. We have held the feeder release since the OAC, nothing is on order against R2. Four circuits changing size is fine as long as R3 lands 31 Jul — anything past 05 Aug and we start eating into the Data Hall 01 rough-in float.

Marcus has the field crew on tray and branch work in the meantime, so there is no idle labor.

AT Alicia TrombleyTurner · Project Manager Today 09:05

Logged. RFI-0142 is marked superseded-on-issue with the date, and I have set a schedule constraint on the Data Hall 01 feeder installation activity tied to E-401 R3 so it shows on the look-ahead if the drawing slips.

This thread is filed to the job record under LPE-01 / Correspondence / RFI-0142. Nobody has to forward it.

Schedule constraint added · ACT-1180

Mail sent from Velorin lands in the job record automatically. The thread is scoped to CTP Lancaster LPE-01, attached to RFI-0142, to drawing E-401 and to decision DEC-0071, and it is visible to everyone with rights on that job — including the person who takes over when Alicia rolls off. It is not sitting in one project manager's Outlook where it disappears at handover, and it is not a screenshot pasted into a chat. Reply from Outlook if you like: inbound replies to the job address are threaded back onto the same record.

LANGUAGES SUPPORTED

the ones actually spoken on US sites

WORKERS USING A NON-EN LOCALE

of 148 badged on LPE-01

GLOSSARY TERMS PINNED

412

never freely translated

DOCS IN QUEUE

1 awaiting human review

LIVE CAPTION SESSIONS · 30d

meetings, toolbox talks, briefings

Supported languages SITE LOCALES

Spanish ES

41 workers on LPE-01

Portuguese PT

7 workers on LPE-01

Polish PL

6 workers on LPE-01

Haitian Creole HT

4 workers on LPE-01

Mandarin ZH

3 workers on LPE-01

Tagalog TL

1 worker on LPE-01

Vietnamese VI

1 worker on LPE-01

Russian RU

available · none badged

Arabic AR

available · right-to-left layout

These are the languages that actually turn up on American construction sites. The list is deliberately short: a language is only added when the glossary and the safety terminology have been reviewed for it, because a half-supported language on a safety briefing is worse than none.

Where it plugs in

VChatEvery message translated both ways at send and at read. Nobody switches language.

VMeet live captionsReal-time captions per attendee language; captions become the draft minutes.

DocumentsDrawings notes, specs, submittals, O&M and MOPs into the queue with human review.

Safety briefingsStand-downs and pre-task plans delivered simultaneously in every language on site.

Toolbox talks & JHAsTalk text and the acknowledgement roster in the worker's own language.

LOTO briefingsIsolation briefings with every energy-control term pinned to the controlled glossary.

Live captions SESSION ACTIVE OAC WEEKLY · OCC 13

MARCUS RUIZ
E-J Electric
09:14:22

We are not closing that wall at Grid H until the CxA witnesses it. The hold point is open, and we still have to megger the branch feeders before anybody signs anything.

ES · No vamos a cerrar esa pared en la línea H hasta que el agente de puesta en marcha lo inspeccione. El hold point sigue abierto, y todavía tenemos que hacer la prueba megger a los alimentadores de derivación antes de que alguien firme algo.

PRIYA RAMAN
Jacobs · CxA
09:14:51

Correct. I will witness at 13:00. Bring the megger results with you — I am not accepting a verbal.

ES · Correcto. Voy a presenciarlo a la 1:00 de la tarde. Traigan los resultados del megger — no voy a aceptar algo verbal.

JOSÉ ALVARADO
E-J Electric
09:15:30

ES · Yo tengo los resultados de las cajas de paso del lado este, pero falta la caja grande arriba del pasillo.

EN · I have the results for the pull boxes on the east side, but the big one above the corridor is still missing.

CAPTION LATENCY 1.4s SPEAKER DIARISATION ON GLOSSARY: ELECTRICAL + CX + LOTO CAPTIONS BECOME DRAFT MINUTES

Captions are attributed to a speaker and a company, timestamped, and retained with the meeting record. When the meeting ends, the caption transcript is the first draft of the minutes — the chair edits rather than types, and the distribution copy goes out in each recipient's language.

Document translation queue

Document	Lang	Status
MOP-0114 Utility tie #2 switching procedure	ES	HUMAN REVIEW
TBT-2026-31 Toolbox talk — leading edge tie-off	ES HT	DELIVERED
JHA-0455 Cable tray install above Data Hall 02	ES PL	TRANSLATING

Anything that carries a signature or a safety instruction — MOPs, JHAs, LOTO briefings, permits — goes through human review before release. Machine output is a draft, never the issued document.

Controlled glossary — trade terms that must not be freely translated 412 TERMSSAFETY CRITICAL

meggerELECTRICALverb + noun

Insulation resistance test with a megohmmeter. Pinned as «prueba megger» in ES, not medidor or probador. A crew told to “measure” a feeder will use a multimeter and report a pass on a cable that is about to fail.

pull boxELECTRICAL

Pinned as «caja de paso». Literal translation gives caja de tirar / caja de jalar, which reads as a trash box in several dialects and has sent crews to the wrong location on a night shift.

LOTOSAFETYNEVER TRANSLATE

Lockout / tagout. The acronym is kept verbatim in every language and the expansion is appended once. Translating it produces a phrase nobody recognizes on a lock box, and a lock nobody recognizes is a lock somebody removes.

hold pointCOMMISSIONINGNEVER TRANSLATE

A point in the work that may not be passed until a named party witnesses it. Kept verbatim, expanded as «punto de espera obligatorio — hold point». The soft translations all read as “a pause” and crews work straight through them.

try-startSAFETYNEVER TRANSLATE

The verification step where the start button is pressed after isolation to prove zero energy. Pinned verbatim. Translating it as intentar arrancar reads as an instruction to start the equipment.

energizedELECTRICALSAFETY CRITICAL

Pinned as «energizado» and always paired with the arc flash boundary value. Vivo and con corriente are both in circulation and neither is unambiguous across dialects.

witness pointCOMMISSIONING

Distinct from a hold point: work may proceed if the witness does not attend after notice. Pinned separately so the two never collapse into one word in translation — the difference is a schedule day versus a torn-out wall.

hot workSAFETYSAFETY CRITICAL

Welding, cutting, grinding — anything producing a spark or flame, under permit. Pinned as «trabajo en caliente» with the permit number. Trabajo caliente alone is read as “working in the heat”.

Trade terms are pinned to a controlled glossary rather than translated freely. The glossary is owned by the safety and commissioning leads on the job, versioned, and applied everywhere at once — chat, captions, documents, briefings. A term marked never translate is passed through verbatim with a one-line expansion the first time it appears. This is not a quality preference: mistranslating a safety term is a safety incident, and it is investigated as one.

Reporting›Executive›One-click reports

Executive Reports ONE CLICK · ONE ENGINE

Five reports, one calculation engine. No template computes anything — every figure is a named field the engine has already resolved, so the Turner-facing report and the internal report cannot disagree. CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · Job 250750HB · E-J Electric / H.B. Frazer JV.

engine build 2026.07.29-a credit_mode share_of_spend 6 fields pending source

Report period

Data date

as of7/12/26· Riskcast R77

Recipient

TC Turner Construction GC · CTP Lancaster campus · 3 named recipients

Pulls from P6 campus schedule Update 216/30/26 G702 / G703 pay app 177/22/26 Riskcast production R77 · wk 307/12/26 Material CTD ledger MA7/23/26 GF field true-up by area6/30/26 CO log r47/22/26 JDS estimate 03-13-26frozen

Ready. Last generation: Turner-facing R2.0 · U1921 · 20 Jul 2026 · 41 figures, 41 sourced, 0 unsourced.

Report spine — the six figures that print on every report, and why each one earns its place

Adjusted PF · all codes

1.01

30,928 ÷ 30,596 baseline

The single number the whole Turner position rests on — the difference between “the crews are failing” and “the crews are at the standard the GMP priced”.

Reported PF · all codes

0.79

30,928 ÷ 39,225 spent

Printed beside the adjusted figure, always. Publishing only the adjusted number is what makes a report read as advocacy; showing both is what makes it credible.

Field % vs earned %

17% / 10.2%

spread 6.8 pts

The spread is the entire true-up-lag and phase-weighting argument — and the early-warning signal the day the two diverge for a real reason.

Hours left to authorized

308,896

348,121 − 39,225

The contractual ceiling. Every forecast conversation starts from this number, not from an EAC somebody built.

Compression exposure

+25,107

hrs above authorized · typed

Names the claim. Keeping it in its own typed field is precisely what stops it being smuggled back into the budget as a second 22%.

Approved COs not in contract

$4.85M

4,857,363 − 2,817

Approved value carrying no contractual protection. Arguably the most under-reported figure in the entire set — it appears on no current report.

Report A · GC-facing · issued to Turner Construction

Project Status Report — CTP Lancaster LPE-01

E-J Electric / H.B. Frazer JV · Job 250750HB · Electrical, Lot PE-01 · prepared by Carl Parks

Report

R2.0 · U1921

Period

Week 30 · through 7/12/26

Production data date

Riskcast R77 · 7/12/26

Field true-up

6/30/26

Schedule

Campus U18 → U21

Contract sum

$61,596,763.00

Credit mode

share_of_spend · 0.78

Field in place

17%

GF true-up 6/30 · weighted 16.8%

Manpower on site

28 travellers

Adjusted PF

1.01

credit 22% factor

Net cash available

—

Reported → adjusted

0.79 → 1.01

all cost codes

SUMExecutive Summarydata date 7/12/26

The job is 17% physically in place against the GF field true-up of 6/30/26, led by Area 1 at ~41% and Area 5 at ~47%. The Riskcast production report reads 10.2% earned — 30,928 hours earned against the 303,309-hour Riskcast budget. Our position is that the 6.8-point spread is a true-up lag plus phase weighting, not lost production: rough-in is hour-light, and the hour-heavy scope (wire pulls, terminations, fixtures, testing) is still in front of us.

Read correctly — that is, crediting the 22% labor factor the GMP already prices — the field is at the standard the contract was sold against, not under it. 39,225 spent hours carry a productive baseline of 30,596; 30,928 hours were earned against it. That is an adjusted performance factor of 1.01, and it clears the baseline by 332 hours.

Cash position is not computable from the current data. There is no payables ledger and no receipt has been recorded, so receipts minus disbursements cannot be formed. Partner draws ~7/31 (HBF ~$650K, E-J ~$200K) and the June requisition in early August (~$1.0M) carry field labor through August.
Productivity read on the priced basis is 1.01. The GMP already prices a 22% labor factor: raw NECA 203,692 × 1.22 = 248,505 factored productive hours. Measuring earned hours against un-credited spend double-charges us for a condition that was sold.
The overrun beyond the priced 22% is owner-caused compression — measured, not a second 22%. It is quantified from the schedule (predecessor slip against our own obligation dates), carried as a typed exposure, and never folded into the budget.
23,208 executed change-order labor hours ($2,227,714 of labor value) are already inside the spend against which base-scope productivity is being measured — 6.7% of the authorized budget.
Manpower, not productivity, is the schedule driver. 92 on site today against a requirement of ~104 average electricians at 58 hrs/man-week to hold the completion date.

§1Hour Basis — Raw NECA → GMP (the 22% labor factor is in the GMP)dim_hour_ladder

Basis	Hours	What it is
Base productive — raw NECA book	203,692	NECA-1 labor units at ideal conditions. The unfactored base. This is the only quantity the 22% is priced on.
+ supervision, lift spotting, QA/QC, material handling	99,617	The 203,692 → 303,309 step. Level-of-effort scope. This is not the 22% and must never be labeled as such.
= Riskcast budget	303,309	The budget the production system measures against. 203,692 + 99,617.
+ 22% labor pool	44,812	203,692 × 0.22 = 44,812.24. Priced on the base productive hours, not on the level-of-effort.
= AUTHORIZED BUDGET	348,121	303,309 + 44,812. The contractual ceiling for base scope.
reference only — raw NECA × 1.22	248,505	Factored productive hours. A cross-check quoted in the summary. It is never a rung, and nothing is derived from it by a further × 1.22.

203,692 × 22% = 44,812. 303,309 + 44,812 = 348,121 authorized. The 22% pool is priced on the base productive hours, not on the level-of-effort.

§2Where We Stand — field %F vs earned %EGF true-up 6/30/26

Building overall 17% in place; earned hours read 10.2% (30,928 ÷ 303,309).
Weighted on scheduled value across the six areas the figure is 16.8% — see §2b. The unweighted 17% and the weighted 16.8% are close only by coincidence; they diverge as Roof and Area 3 come on.
Two areas carry the job today and together they are 24.4% of contract value.

Field % complete by area, GF true-up 6/30/26. Percent complete alone hides the weighting — Roof at 5% is $8.37M of scheduled value, nearly four times Area 5 at 47%.

§2bProduction & Estimate by Areanew — per Turner request

Scheduled value and field completion resolve to a canonical area dimension built from the G703 description prefix, which is exact and needs no judgment. Hour columns require the Riskcast quantity export carrying an area token; that export does not exist in any file supplied, so those cells are stamped pending rather than estimated. The full breakout, the estimate allocated to the same areas, and the derivation rules are in the Production by area report.

Area	Scheduled value	% of contract	Budget hrs (alloc.)	Spent hrs	Earned hrs	Adj. PF	Field %C	Earned value $
Area 1	$12,894,057.95	20.9%	95,030	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	41%	$5,286,564
Roof	$8,366,710.27	13.6%	61,662	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	5%	$418,336
Area 3	$6,372,513.12	10.3%	46,965	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	0%	$0
Area 2	$5,830,313.98	9.5%	42,969	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	3%	$174,909
Area 4	$5,538,442.37	9.0%	40,818	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	0.5%	$27,692
Area 5	$2,152,619.31	3.5%	15,865	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	47%	$1,011,731
non-area — FEE, ADMIN, GC, Engineering, SUPPLIERS, ERRCS, Energy, SCCO	$20,442,106.00	33.2%	—	—	—	—	n/a	—
TOTAL	$61,596,763.00	100%	303,309	39,225	30,928	1.01	17%	$6,919,232

Read this before quoting a percentage. A third of the contract — $20,442,106 — sits outside any area. Any “% complete by area” that implies coverage of the contract is wrong by construction, which is why the non-area bucket is carried explicitly rather than suppressed. Weighted across areas only, field completion is 16.8%; earned value across areas is $6,919,232 = 11.2% of the contract sum.

§3Field Productivity — the real PF, crediting the 22%scope = all_codes

Spent hours — all cost codes, R77 @ 7/12/2639,225

Earned hours — all cost codes30,928

Reported PF = 30,928 ÷ 39,2250.79

Credit — the 22% the GMP priced = 39,225 × 0.22−8,629

Productive baseline = 39,225 × 0.7830,596

ADJUSTED PF = 30,928 ÷ 30,5961.01

Earned clears the baseline by+332 hrs

Raw variance, uncredited (39,225 − 30,928)8,297 hrs

39,225 × 0.78 = 30,596 · 30,928 ÷ 30,596 = 1.01 adjusted.

Named scope	Definition	Spent	Earned	Reported PF	Baseline ×0.78	Adjusted PF
all_codes	Every cost code. Turner’s published headline.	39,225	30,928	0.79	30,596	1.01
ex_supervision	All codes minus SUP only.	34,865	27,615	0.79	27,195	1.02
direct_only	All codes minus SUP, LS and STRETCH.	22,926	15,983	0.70	17,882	0.89

Why three scopes and not one label. The prior revision of this report used the phrase “direct-install codes only” for two different populations that give two different answers (1.02 and 0.89). The engine now stores all three under distinct names and every figure prints the scope it was computed on. Credit basis: credit_mode = share_of_spend, baseline = spend × labor_factor_credit (0.78). The alternative reversal spend ÷ 1.22 gives a 32,152 baseline and 0.96 — 1,556 hours of baseline today, ~13,800 at full budget. It is available as a configuration switch and is not what this report publishes.

§3bRiskcast Production by Cost Code — reported & adjusted ratesadj = rep ÷ 0.78

Code	Description	Budget	Spent	Earned	Rep. PF	Adj. PF	%C	Read
BCC	Branch conduit & raceway	89,123	13,615	5,820	0.43	0.55	6.5%	WATCH — 29% of the job
BCW	Branch wire	17,254	60	3	0.06	0.07	0.0%	not started
RKS	Racks, tray & strut	10,727	4,239	5,770	1.36	1.75	53.8%	best on the job
BX	Boxes & devices	9,954	PENDING	PENDING	0.79	1.01	PENDING	at standard
FCI	Feeder conduit installation	8,035	816	199	0.24	0.31	2.5%	early phase
VESDA	VESDA aspirating detection	4,684	1,949	2,509	1.29	1.65	53.6%	ahead
DAC	Data & comms rough	4,113	218	107	0.49	0.63	2.6%	early phase
FAD	Fire alarm devices	2,464	PENDING	PENDING	0.46	0.59	PENDING	1% complete
Unlisted direct codes inside the subtotal		36,495	14	3	0.21	0.27	0.0%	residual, surfaced
Direct install — subtotal (direct_only)		182,849	22,926	15,983	0.70	0.89	8.7%
SUP	Supervision — level of effort	32,496	4,360	3,314	0.76	1:1	10.2%	no factor
LS	Lift spotting — level of effort	41,760	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	1:1	PENDING	no factor
STRETCH	Stretch & flex — level of effort	12,581	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	1:1	PENDING	no factor
Level of effort — subtotal (loe_cost_codes)		86,837	13,625	12,666	0.93	1:1	14.6%
All other codes — mandatory residual		33,623	2,674	2,279	0.85	1.09	6.8%	extract gap, published
TOTAL — all codes (all_codes)		303,309	39,225	30,928	0.79	1.01	10.2%

The table foots, and it did not before. 182,849 + 86,837 + 33,623 = 303,309 budget; 22,926 + 13,625 + 2,674 = 39,225 spent; 15,983 + 12,666 + 2,279 = 30,928 earned. The prior revision left 2,674 spent, 2,279 earned and 33,623 budget hours silently missing. The engine now refuses to publish an unfooted cost-code table.
Earned-hour coverage of the listed codes is 92.6% of all_codes. Below ~95% this table is not telling the whole story and says so on its face.
Budget-weighted adjusted PF is the honest one-number read. The unweighted table lets RKS at 1.75 on 10,727 budget hours visually offset BCC at 0.55 on 89,123. BCC is 29% of the job; it decides this EAC.
Level-of-effort codes carry no factor and are shown 1:1. Note that the TOTAL row applies the credit across all 39,225 hours including the 13,625 LOE hours; applying the LOE rule consistently would give 0.92. Both readings are stored (all_codes and direct_only_credit); this report publishes all_codes, which is what it has always published.
Spent, earned and %C for BX, FAD, LS and STRETCH are marked pending: the code-level extract publishes their rates but not their hour counts. They are not estimated.

§4Change-Order Manpower — executed to dateCO log r4 · 7/22/26

Executed change order (labor)	Hours	Labor $	Total PCO $	Labor share
Bulletin 1	PENDING	$431,692	$575,589	75.0%
Bulletin 2 (both)	PENDING	$1,106,226	$1,474,968	75.0%
Bulletin 4	PENDING	$388,447	$575,477	67.5%
Bulletin 5 (net of wetlab credit)	PENDING	$301,349	$457,925	65.8%
Executed to date — bulletins 1–5	23,208	$2,227,714	$3,083,959	72.2%

Hours are published in total only; the per-bulletin split is not in the CO log extract and is not estimated. Labor share is a derived column and the fastest sanity check on a new bulletin’s pricing — anything outside the 65–75% band on this job is worth a second read before it goes out. CO labor is 23,208 ÷ 348,121 = 6.7% of the authorized budget: added scope consuming budget that base-scope PF is then measured against.

§5Cash PositionG702 App 17 · req register

Cash went negative in April (March billing was skipped) and again in June, bottoming at −$69K on 6/1.
Latest certificate — on application —. Recorded receipts to date —.
Partner draws are due ~7/31 — HBF ~$650K, E-J ~$200K. The June requisition funds in early August (~$1.0M) and carries field labor through August.
Billed % and earned-value % are two different numbers and now carry two different names. Billed to date $14,884,367.03 ÷ $61,596,763 = 24.16% per the G702. The 28% previously published is an earned-value read (material purchased plus prefab complete) and is not reproducible from the contract and billing figures; it is now labeled earned_value_pct with its basis stated, or it does not print.
Field install reads 17% because there is no laydown area: material and prefab are complete ahead of the field and cannot be set.

§6Below the Line — LARP & per diem to date

Reimbursable premium — billed / incurred to date	Amount	Status
LARP — May	$62,151	executed
LARP — June	$56,068	executed
LARP — July (in progress)	$64,801	in progress
of which per diem — 185 days × $197	$36,445
LARP executed to date	$118,219

§7Forward Manpower & the Askheadcount 7/12/26

Classification	Today	Sept target	Nov peak
General foremen	2	PENDING	PENDING
Foremen	9	PENDING	PENDING
Journeymen wiremen	51	PENDING	PENDING
Apprentices	18	PENDING	PENDING
CW / CE	12	PENDING	PENDING
TOTAL on site	92	105	~115
of which travellers	28	—	—

Hours required per week to hold the date: 308,896 hours remaining ÷ ~56 weeks = ~5,516/wk ≈ 95 electricians at 58 hrs/man-week on the authorized basis. On the internal forecast EAC the same arithmetic gives ~6,000/wk and ~104 electricians — the difference between those two staffing answers is the compression exposure, and it is why it is typed separately.

Ramp to 105 in September, peak ~115 in November. Dashed line is the plan required to hold the date; solid is the committed ramp.

Committed rampRequired to hold the date

The ask, 1 of 2. Recognize the GMP + 22% labor factor as the performance basis for this contract. On that basis the adjusted PF is 1.01 and the crews are at standard.
The ask, 2 of 2. Release work areas in sequence. Area 2 is on clash-detection hold and Area 3 has no released work; the ramp cannot be absorbed into areas that are not open.

§8Schedule — campus Update 18 → Update 21: the compression10,063 activities matched

Predecessor work slipped +23 to +74 days between Update 18 (3/31/26) and Update 21 (6/30/26), while E-J’s completion obligations moved only +15 to +48 days. The difference — up to ~26 days per area — is work window removed from our scope without a corresponding change to what we owe. Campus zero-float activities rose from 285 to 432; Area 1 alone went from 47 to 222.

Measure	Update 18	Update 21	Shift	Read
Predecessor work — slip range	—	—	+23 to +74 d	by others
E-J completion obligations — shift range	—	—	+15 to +48 d	our obligation
Window compression = predecessor slip − own obligation shift	—	—	up to ~26 d / area	the claim, as a metric
Zero-float activities — campus	285	432	+147	risk rising
Zero-float activities — Area 1	47	222	+175	risk located
Activities past scheduled finish	—	8	—	operational
Activities due before 9/30/26	—	47	—	next 90 days

§8bE-J schedule Update 19 → 6/22/262,101 of 2,131 matched · 97.9%

Measure	Count	Magnitude	Read
Activities finishing later	659	—	absorbed inside an unchanged completion date
Activities shortened	106	190 calendar days removed	duration cut
Activities added (new scope)	30	337 duration-days added	scope growth
Activities losing float	670	avg 20.9 days lost	buffer consumed
Project completion	—	09/29/2027 — unchanged	all of the above absorbed with no date relief

Match rate 97.9% is printed because a comparison below ~90% is not like-for-like; the engine warns rather than publishing a silent apples-to-oranges delta.

§9Change Orders — status per the CO loglog r4 · 7/22/26

Status	Count	Value
Approved & booked	PENDING	$2,896,635
Approved by verbal — log update pending	PENDING	$1,960,728
TOTAL APPROVED	—	$4,857,363
Still pending — all statuses	23	$2,289,071
Net change by CO in the contract sum (G702 App 18)	1	$2,817
Approved but NOT in the contract sum	—	$4,854,546

PCO 131 / SCCO-03 — prolongation. Priced 09/12/2027–10/25/2027. $392,683.08 of labor, entirely PM / engineering / admin with no craft classification. $451,585.54 submitted, $385,336.00 approved. The 16 days between the Update 18 completion date (10/25/2027) that PCO 131 priced and the Update 21 date (11/10/2027) sit outside any existing instrument.

Reconciliation line, mandatory. If a report claims approved change orders, it must show how much of that value is contractual. $4,857,363 approved less $2,817 booked into the contract sum leaves $4,854,546 of approved value with no contract protection. Of that, $2,050,557.00 has no SOV line to bill against at all — see the Cash & billing report.

CORRECTION APPLIED The 22% labor factor was applied twice in the report issued 07/21/26. This version rebuilds it on the Turner method.

The old hour ladder labeled 248,505 as “Bid NECA 1” when that figure is already 203,692 × 1.22 — the factor was inside it — and then applied “+22%” a second time to reach 303,309, so the 99,617 hours of supervision, lift spotting, QA/QC and material handling that actually make up that step disappeared from the story and were re-badged as “the 22%”. Nobody caught it because the two constructions land 133 hours apart (248,505 × 1.22 = 303,176 vs 203,692 + 99,617 = 303,309, a 0.04% coincidence); this version uses the Turner ladder — exactly one 22% step, at the 44,812-hour labor pool — and states the headline PF on the same all-codes population Turner publishes.

Report B · internal · not for Turner

Internal Project Report — CTP Lancaster LPE-01 NOT FOR TURNER

E-J Electric / H.B. Frazer JV · Job 250750HB · rebuilt on the shared calculation engine, 29 July 2026

Supersedes

072126_Internal_Report

Data date — single

R77 · 7/12/26

Hour ladder

dim_hour_ladder (shared)

Headline scope

all_codes

Credit

labor_factor_credit = 0.78

Ceiling

348,121 authorized

FIXBefore / after — every figure that moved, and why6 engine rules enforced

Line	As issued 07/21/26	Corrected — Turner method	Why it moved
Ladder rung 1	not shown at all	203,692 raw NECA, base productive	The unfactored base is the only thing the 22% may be priced on. Without it the ladder has no floor.
Ladder rung 2 label	“Bid NECA 1 = 248,505”	248,505 = raw NECA × 1.22, factored productive hours — reference_only	248,505 already contains the factor. Calling it the bid treats it as unfactored and licenses a second application.
248,505 → 303,309	“+22%” — “NECA 1 + 22% fair budget”	+99,617 supervision, lift spotting, QA/QC, material handling	This step is level-of-effort scope, not a factor. Re-badging it as “the 22%” is what made the factor appear twice.
303,309 → 348,121	“Authorized + pool” — the second 22%	+44,812 = 203,692 × 0.22 — the one and only 22% step	labor_factor may be applied exactly once in the ladder. The engine enforces it.
Ladder cross-check	248,505 × 1.22 = 303,176	203,692 + 99,617 = 303,309	133 hours = 0.04%. The coincidence that let a conceptually wrong ladder pass a numerical smell test.
Headline population	direct-install only, LOE stripped	all_codes	This — not a different view of the factor — is what produced the 0.87.
Spent hours	23,472	39,225	Same formula, different hour set. Both reports multiply by 0.78; only the population differs.
Earned hours	15,862	30,928
Reported PF	0.68	0.79
Productive baseline × 0.78	18,308	30,596	39,225 × 0.78 = 30,595.5.
Real / adjusted PF	0.87 — “13% under baseline”	1.01 — at the standard the GMP priced	The conclusion flips. Not because the factor changed, but because the population was named.
Same-data proof	—	33,132 × 0.78 = 25,843; 25,739 ÷ 25,843 = 1.00	The old report’s own §2 table, its own vintage, run through Turner’s credit, gives 1.00.
§2 cost-code table	no adjusted column anywhere	Adj. PF = rep ÷ 0.78; SUP / LS / STRETCH forced to 1:1	Same column definition as the Turner report §3b. One definition, two templates.
Hours remaining	~340,000 (EAC 373,228 − 33,132)	308,896 = 348,121 − 39,225	Remaining is measured from the contractual ceiling, never from somebody’s EAC.
Above the ceiling	folded into the forecast	compression_exposure_hours — typed, separate, +25,107 / +34,321 / +42,239	Precisely what stops it being smuggled into the budget as a second 22%.
Forecast basis wording	“stays the NECA 1 / +22% range”	deleted	That phrase is the double-count, in words.
The token “0.78”	credit multiplier AND the §2 reported PF	labor_factor_credit = 0.78; PFs print to 2dp with rep / adj labels	“Lower than the R77’s 0.78 above” conflated a multiplier with a measurement.
Data date	three vintages at once — 23,472 / 33,132 / weekly 17,911	one — R77 7/12/26, stamped on every table	The renderer refuses to publish a section that mixes data dates without an explicit override.

The two ladders in the same frame. The old one has no 203,692 rung at all, which is how the 99,617 support hours vanished.

TESTThe decisive test — the old report’s own numbers, Turner’s method

Code	Budget	Spent	Earned	Rep. PF	Adj. PF
BCC	89,123	11,204	4,606	0.41	0.53
SUP LOE	32,496	3,936	2,758	0.70	1:1
BCW	17,254	60	3	0.05	0.06
RKS	10,727	3,866	4,532	1.17	1.50
BX	9,954	1,932	1,514	0.78	1.00
FCI	8,035	445	123	0.28	0.35
VESDA	4,684	1,949	2,509	1.29	1.65
DAC	4,113	108	32	0.30	0.38
TOTAL	303,309	33,132	25,739	0.78	1.00

Its own data, its own vintage, its own cost codes — run through baseline = spent × 0.78 the old report gives 1.00, materially Turner’s 1.01. The 0.87 was never a disagreement about the 22%. It was an unnamed population. This table is shown at its own 07/20 vintage and is stamped as such; it is evidence, not a published measurement.

§1The Real Productivity PictureR77 · 7/12/26

Headline — all_codes

0.79 → 1.01

39,225 spent / 30,928 earned

Sub-read — ex_supervision

0.79 → 1.02

34,865 / 27,615

Sub-read — direct_only

0.70 → 0.89

22,926 / 15,983

Old headline, retained as sub-read

0.68 → 0.87

23,472 / 15,862 · LOE stripped, 07/20 vintage

The bid already prices a 22% labor factor — raw NECA 203,692 × 1.22 = 248,505 factored productive hours, a reference figure and not a budget rung. That factor is a cost E-J has already sold and does not re-bill; only the overrun beyond it is claimed, and it is measured from the schedule.
The headline is 1.01 on all codes. 0.87 is retained only as a clearly labeled LOE-stripped sub-read at its own vintage, presented next to Turner’s own direct-code reads. It is never presented as the real PF.
Every PF here carries a companion PF excluding data-flagged lines — see §3. Quoting a PF that includes a 126,300 hrs/C data error against a goal of 13 is indefensible in a claim.

§1bProduction Trend — weekly CPISPI is not published — see note

Week ending	Spent	Earned	CPI	Adj. PF = CPI ÷ 0.78	Manpower	Flag
6/07/26	3,773.27	2,752.50	0.73	0.94	PENDING	duplicate pair — matches 7/12
6/14/26	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING
6/21/26	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING
6/28/26	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING
7/05/26	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING
7/12/26	3,773.27	2,752.50	0.73	0.94	PENDING	duplicate pair — matches 6/07
Six weeks — sum	17,911	18,170	1.01	1.30	—
Cumulative — R77 all codes	39,225	30,928	0.79	1.01	92

Two data flags the engine raises automatically, one of which the old report never noticed. (1) flag_duplicate_week fires: the 7/12 pair is identical to 6/07 — a likely Riskcast carry-over, and it inflates the weekly sums. (2) assert sum(weekly_earned) ≤ cumulative_earned fails against the vintage the old report used: weekly earned 18,170 exceeds its stated cumulative earned 15,862 by 2,308, while weekly spent 17,911 falls 5,561 short of its 23,472. The weekly trend chart and the cumulative CPI could not both be right as they were published. Per-week spent/earned for the four unflagged weeks is not in the extract and is not reconstructed here.

SPI is deliberately not published. The old table labeled one column “CPI/SPI” and printed one value. Until earned-vs-planned is measured separately from earned-vs-spent there is only a CPI, and it is called that.

§3Data & Measurement — how much of the gap is bad datamissing-quantity engine

The earned gap is 7,393 hours. It is not one thing, and reporting it as one thing is how a data-entry failure gets argued as a productivity failure.

Gap decomposition	Hours	Share	Recoverable
Expected supervision / indirect (LOE spent − LOE earned)	1,179	16.0%	by design
Missing-quantity data error	~4,065	55.0%	yes — enter the quantity
Real over-run, balance — concentrated in BCC	~2,149	29.0%	no
Earned gap	7,393	100%

Exception	Hours	Rate	Action
Krausz — BCC / RKS / BX / FCI, essentially no quantity	~3,876	—	quantity entry, then re-baseline
BCC — 1,263 hrs against 1 unit	1,263	126,300 hrs/C	goal rate is 13 — scrub
Strut supporting conduit / CRAs miscoded to RKS	—	RKS inflated to 1.17	recoded 7/10

FLAG missing quantity where hours > threshold and qty ≤ threshold; FLAG rate anomaly where unit rate > goal × multiple. Both are first-class engine features, not manual notes, and every published PF carries a companion pf_excluding_flagged_lines.

§4bCrew & Individual GradesBCC footage · real PF = reported ÷ 0.78

Foreman	Reported PF	Real PF (credit 22%)	Grade	Strength / task
Fishburn	0.83	1.06	A	BCC lead — hold as the pace-setting crew
Grimes	0.58	0.74	C	steady, needs quantity discipline
Kilpatrick	0.37	0.47	D	re-pair with a stronger JW
Miller	0.27	0.35	C+	strong off BCC; misassigned
Patterson	0.15	0.19	F	BCC — immediate recovery plan
Krausz	INC	INC	INC	data-quality flag — excluded from the crew composite until quantities are entered

Grade bands are explicit configuration on the real PF, not the reported one: A ≥ 1.00 · C 0.70–0.80 · D ≈ 0.45 · F < 0.25. Rows carrying a data-quality flag render as INC and are excluded from any crew-composite PF — grading a foreman on a number the office failed to capture is not a performance conversation.

§5Prefab — manpower, production & status~3,877 hrs, tracked separately

Prefab is a detailing plus shop-fabrication operation. Its ~3,877 hours are excluded from field manpower and from field PF, so nothing in §1 is contaminated by shop production. Prefab is also a hard field constraint: cable tray cannot install until the CRAs and HACs are set.

Zone	Prefab % complete	Status
Area 5 — all zones	100%	complete
Area 1 — lead zones	100%	complete
Zone 1.6	99%	closing out
Zone 1.8	50%	in fab
Zones 1.7 / 1.9	14%	started
Area 2 — all zones	0%	on hold — clash detection

§8Forecast / EAC & Manpower Gap — capped at authorizedrule 4 enforced

Basis	Hours	vs authorized 348,121	Type	Provenance
Authorized budget — the ceiling	348,121	—	contractual	303,309 + 44,812, both derived from published figures
Spent to date, all codes	39,225	—	actual	Riskcast R77 @ 7/12/26
Hours remaining on the authorized basis	308,896	—	the number to plan on	348,121 − 39,225
Forecast EAC (as carried in the old report)	373,228	+25,107	compression_exposure_hours	NOT REPRODUCIBLE from any supplied figure
P6 resource-loaded total	382,442	+34,321	compression_exposure_hours	NOT REPRODUCIBLE — needs the resource-loaded export
“EAC @ raw 0.78 PF”	390,360	+42,239	compression_exposure_hours	NOT REPRODUCIBLE — closest constructions 388,858 / 388,991

No forecast may exceed 348,121 without being typed. Everything above the ceiling renders as compression_exposure_hours in its own row, described as change-order recovery, and never as budget. The old report’s “~340,000 hrs remaining” was EAC 373,228 − spent 33,132 — a remaining figure measured from an unverifiable forecast that was itself anchored to the doubled ladder.
Manpower gap. 308,896 hours over ~56 weeks is ~5,516 hrs/wk ≈ 95 electricians at 58 hrs/man-week. The internal count reads 74 on site; the Turner-facing report reads 92 (51 JW vs 68 JW). These do not reconcile in either direction and the difference is not a simple as-of-date lag — the engine holds both with their source and refuses to average them.
Riskcast will not produce a system EAC below 10% complete and the job is not there. No placeholder is rendered.

§9Action Items

Data first. Enter the missing quantities, scrub the 126,300 hrs/C error, confirm the strut recode of 7/10, then re-baseline PF. ~4,065 of the 7,393-hour gap is recoverable by data entry alone.
Enforce daily logs and photos. Install notes were not entered at all until 6/30.
Resolve Area 2 clash detection — prefab is 0% and on hold, and cable tray cannot start behind it.
Recovery plan on BCC. 89,123 budget hours, 29% of the job, 0.55 adjusted. One code decides this EAC.
Push Turner for a current schedule update and close the Trimble points for Areas 1 and 2; the Engineering → Prefab → Install procedure due 7/8 is still outstanding.
Reconcile the manpower definition with the GC-facing count before either number is quoted again.

Shared component · Report A §2b · Report B §2b · Report C §2

Production & Estimate by Area

One canonical area dimension, four sources mapped onto it. The breakout Turner asked for, and the estimate cut to the same lines so budget-versus-actual is comparable per area.

Area dimension

dim_area · 6 areas + 6 non-area buckets

Reference mapping

G703 description prefix

Schedule source

campus · Update 21

Field true-up

6/30/26

Weighted field %

16.8%

AProduction by areahours pending the Riskcast area export

Area	Scheduled value	% of contract	Budget hrs	Spent hrs	Earned hrs	Rep. PF	Adj. PF	Field %C	Earned % (hrs)	Earned value $	Variance
Area 1	$12,894,057.95	20.9%	95,030	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	41%	PENDING	$5,286,564	+45.1 pts
Roof	$8,366,710.27	13.6%	61,662	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	5%	PENDING	$418,336	−14.3 pts
Area 3	$6,372,513.12	10.3%	46,965	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	0%	PENDING	$0	−15.5 pts
Area 2	$5,830,313.98	9.5%	42,969	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	3%	PENDING	$174,909	−11.6 pts
Area 4	$5,538,442.37	9.0%	40,818	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	0.5%	PENDING	$27,692	−13.1 pts
Area 5	$2,152,619.31	3.5%	15,865	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	47%	PENDING	$1,011,731	+9.4 pts
Areas — subtotal	$41,154,657.00	66.8%	303,309	39,225	30,928	0.79	1.01	16.8%	10.2%	$6,919,232	0.0
non-area — FEE, ADMIN, GC, Engineering, SUPPLIERS, ERRCS, Energy, SCCO	$20,442,106.00	33.2%	—	—	—	—	—	n/a	n/a	—	—
CONTRACT TOTAL	$61,596,763.00	100%	303,309	39,225	30,928	0.79	1.01	17%	10.2%	$6,919,232	—

Variance = the area’s share of earned value less its share of contract value, in points. It is the column that tells you what a percent-complete bar chart cannot: Area 1 is producing 76.4% of all earned value on 31.3% of area contract value, while Roof is 20.3% of area value and 6.0% of progress, and Area 3 is 15.5% of value at zero. Field %C is the GF true-up; Earned % is earned ÷ budget hours and is pending. Budget hrs are the Riskcast 303,309 allocated on SOV weight per §4.2 method 2 — exact at system level, prorated within a system, and auditable because the weights are published SOV values.

BThe estimate, broken to the same areasSOV-prorated · auditable weights

Area	SOV weight	Base productive hrs	+ support hrs	= Riskcast budget	+ 22% pool	= Authorized hrs	Material budget $	Scheduled value $
Area 1	31.33%	63,819	31,211	95,030	14,040	109,070	$3,352,294	$12,894,058
Roof	20.33%	41,410	20,252	61,662	9,110	70,772	$2,175,239	$8,366,710
Area 3	15.48%	31,540	15,425	46,965	6,939	53,904	$1,656,773	$6,372,513
Area 2	14.17%	28,857	14,112	42,969	6,348	49,317	$1,515,808	$5,830,314
Area 4	13.46%	27,412	13,406	40,818	6,031	46,849	$1,439,925	$5,538,442
Area 5	5.23%	10,654	5,211	15,865	2,344	18,209	$559,654	$2,152,619
TOTAL — areas	100%	203,692	99,617	303,309	44,812	348,121	$10,699,693	$41,154,657

The pool is distributed on base productive hours by area, never on total hours by area. Turner’s caption — “priced on the base productive hours, not on the level-of-effort” — is an allocation rule, not just a description. Areas with a heavy level-of-effort share would otherwise absorb pool hours they were never priced. labor_pool_hours[area] = base_productive_hours[area] × 0.22.

CPlanned vs earned by area$ of scheduled value

Two areas beat the plan and four are behind it, but the money says something else. Area 1 alone is $3.35M ahead of plan; Roof, Area 3, Area 2 and Area 4 are $0.84M, $0.96M, $0.70M and $0.80M behind it — $3.30M of planned progress not delivered, in areas that between them are 42.4% of the contract.

Planned at GMP 15%Earned — ahead of planEarned — behind plan

NOTEHow area is derived, and what happens when it is not

Source	Area rule	Quality
SOV / estimate	Regex on the G703 description prefix — AREA 1 …, ROOF …. Exact, no judgment.	reference
P6 campus	Activity code / WBS token. Resolves to milestones per area — MILE-1050 / 1070 / 1080 / 1090 = Areas 1–4 substantial completion.	good
P6 — E-J file	Room-level activities: A1 · HAC 1&2, A4 · ER 408. Column-line token in the activity name.	good
Riskcast	Requires an area token in the quantity export. It does not exist in any file supplied.	blocked
COBie model	Only 544 of 4,799 components carry an area in the Space field. Do not build on it.	unusable

Schedule activity → area, by column line. Every activity resolves through one of two tokens: the campus WBS area code, or the column-line prefix in the E-J activity name. Both write to the same area_id, and the source is stored on the row as schedule_source ∈ {campus, ej} so a per-area number can always be traced back to which file produced it.

The SOV mapping is the reference the other three are checked against, because the G703 prefix is exact. When P6 and the SOV disagree on an activity’s area, the SOV wins and the activity is listed on the exception report rather than silently reassigned.

Activities with no area. They are never prorated across areas and never dropped. They route to the explicit non-area buckets — GC, ADMIN, SUPPLIERS, FEE, ENG, ERRCS — which exist precisely so the SOV foots to the contract sum. That bucket is $20,442,106, one third of the contract. An activity that resolves to no bucket at all fails ingest with a named exception; it does not get an average.

What unblocks the hour columns. A Riskcast quantity/hours export carrying an area token. Until it lands, per-area production can only be produced from the GF true-up — percentages, no hours, no PF — and every hour cell on this page stays stamped PENDING. The substitute is stated on the report; it is not silently filled.

Report C · materials · cost to date, alignment and stop-spend

Materials vs the Estimate

One report replacing three artifacts — the stop-spend brief, the CTD ledger and the alignment workbook — on the same skeleton as Reports A and B.

CTD ledger

7/23/26 · 765 lines

Material budget

$10,699,693

Analyzed set

$843,169

Reconciliation coverage

53.0%

Unclassified

$229,379 · 27.2%

Installable vs field

5.0% / 17%

material is behind the work

Indirect share of spend

36.1%

$304,335 that builds nothing

Unclassified share

27.2%

$229,379 with no read at all

Reconciliation coverage

53.0%

the honesty metric

Stop-spend itemized

42.2%

$128,459 of $304,335

§1Material vs the estimateJDS estimate 03-13-26

Measure	Amount	Read
Material budget — JDS estimate	$10,699,693	labor $42.2M, total sell $61.59M
Verified purchased to date	$843,169	7.88% of budget
installable material	$538,834	5.04% of budget
indirect / consumable	$304,335	36.1% of spend
Field complete — GF true-up	17%	weighted 16.8%
Proportional material at field %	$1,818,948	10,699,693 × 0.17
Variance vs the estimate at field %	−$975,779	material running behind the work

The footing assertion the old brief failed. installable + indirect == verified_purchased. 538,834 + 304,335 = 843,169, but the brief published a total of 867,096 — $23,927 unexplained. The brief’s own percentages confirm 843,169 is the real denominator (304,335 ÷ 843,169 = 36.1%; 538,834 ÷ 10,699,693 = 5.04%). Only its headline “8.1% of budget” used 867,096. On the correct basis it is 7.88%. The engine refuses to publish an unfooted total.

The naive read is backwards. Installable material is at 5.0% against 17% of the work in place — material is running behind the field, not ahead of it. What looks like an overspend is 36% indirect purchasing sitting inside the comparison.

§2Cost to date by category — committed / received / installedalignment workbook + CTD ledger

Category	Committed (open PO)	Received · AP-posted	Installed $	Cost code	% cplt	Adj PF	Read
Cable tray	PENDING	$220,604	PENDING	RKS	54%	1.75	ALIGNED
Strut & supports	PENDING	$46,381	PENDING	RKS	54%	1.75	ALIGNED
Conduit	PENDING	$109,996	PENDING	BCC / FCI	5%	0.55	STAGED AHEAD
Fittings	PENDING	$1,920	PENDING	BCC	5%	0.55	staged ahead
Boxes & devices	PENDING	$6,600	PENDING	BCC	5%	0.55	staged ahead
Wire & cable	PENDING	$9,392	PENDING	BCW / BX	15%	0.54	ALIGNED
Fire alarm / security	PENDING	$11,287	PENDING	FAD	1%	0.59	staged ahead
Firestop	PENDING	$127,331	PENDING	none in the top-8	—	—	FLAG — no cost code
Lighting / grounding / gear	PENDING	$5,323	PENDING	—	—	—	minor
Installable — subtotal	—	$538,834	—		—	—	5.04% of budget
Unclassified	PENDING	$229,379	—	INDIRECT (assumed)	—	—	DATA QUALITY — no read at all
Tools & consumables	PENDING	$61,589	—	INDIRECT	—	—	EXCLUDE
Safety & PPE	PENDING	$13,367	—	INDIRECT	—	—	EXCLUDE
Indirect — subtotal	—	$304,335	—		—	—	36.1% of spend
TOTAL — analyzed set	—	$843,169	—		—	—

Column definitions, because these three words get used loosely. Received is the gate-verified requisition line extension — material invoiced and posted. Committed is open purchase-order value not yet received; it exists in no supplied file and is not estimated. Installed $ requires quantity-per-area from Riskcast; also pending. Indirect categories are excluded from the alignment comparison entirely rather than shown with a blank — including them is precisely what makes the numbers look wrong.

§3The unclassified bucket — a data-quality problem, not a purchasing problem27.2% of analyzed spend

$229,379 has no read at all. It is the single largest line in the analysis and it is a categorisation failure, not a spending failure. Until the categoriser is tuned, more than a quarter of the analyzed spend cannot be aligned to a cost code, an area or a percent complete. The alignment workbook’s own finding 5 says it is dominated by the same indirect items and should mostly reclassify to indirect — but “should mostly” is not a number you put in front of a GC.

The unclassified share is published on the face of the report precisely so it creates pressure to go to zero. Any materials conclusion drawn today is drawn with 27.2% of the analyzed set unreadable and 47% of the recorded ledger outside the analysis entirely.

Basis & reconciliation	Amount	Note
CTD ledger total — category MA, 765 lines	$1,591,083.11	19 Mar – 8 Jul 2026
Verified requisition total — the analyzed set	$843,169	326 gate-verified lines + 17 invoices
Unreconciled	$747,914	47% of the ledger, unexamined
Reconciliation coverage	53.0%	printed on every materials conclusion

No supplied document quantifies this gap or says what is in it. Every conclusion in the old brief was drawn from roughly half the recorded material spend, without saying so.

§4The fix — join on REFERENCEproved on CP00212

The CTD file is an accounts-payable posting register, not a materials tracker. COST CODE is blank on all 765 rows; EMPLY CLASS, COMPANY CODE and EMP ID are empty on every row; SOURCE carries vendor plus invoice number only — no description, no quantity, no UOM. Keyword scans for CONDUIT, TRAY, STRUT, WIRE, CABINET, BATTERY and FIRESTOP return zero rows.

REFERENCE is the only viable join key, and it demonstrably works. 199 distinct CP000xx / MP000xx values. Reference CP00212 totals $127,331.28 — a single Graybar invoice, 9353339416, dated 6/11/26 — which is exactly the $127,331 firestop line in the alignment workbook. One reference, one category, to the cent. Building the reference → cost_code lookup is the single highest-value fix in the whole materials chain.

Populate COST CODE on the ledger, or maintain the reference lookup.
Item-level categorisation must come from the requisition / invoice detail, never from this file.
Add area_id to the requisition line — without it, materials by area cannot be produced at all.
Drop the pasted pivot in columns K/L on ingest (usecols = A:I); its “5-Jul” and “8-Jul” rows are children of “Jul”, not extra months.

Top vendors — CTD ledger	Amount
NEFCO	$398,379
Berkshire Systems Group	$339,947
Montana Datacom	$337,329
Kendall Electric	$145,760
Graybar	$137,363
Top 5 — 85.4% of the ledger	$1,358,778

Posting month	Amount
March 2026	$118,860.17
April 2026	$530,556.08
May 2026	$114,332.70
June 2026	$813,548.73
July 2026 (to 7/8)	$13,785.43
Ledger total — two months carry 84%	$1,591,083.11

§5Where to stop the spendtop-15 lines only

Line	Amount	Action	Why
Storage cabinets & job boxes	$74,836	FREEZE	five utility cabinets, chests and a jobsite cabinet already on site
Fall-protection tie-backs	$38,963	FREEZE new orders	reissue and track the existing SRLs
Cordless tool batteries	$10,560	CONTROL-ISSUE	via the tool crib
Safety equipment	$4,100	ONE-TIME	no recurring authorization
Itemized	$128,459	42.2% of the indirect bucket
Indirect bucket — not yet itemized	$175,876	57.8% of indirect spend has never been examined line by line

Stop-spend itemisation coverage is published as a KPI for one reason: quoting a $128,459 stop-spend list against a $304,335 indirect bucket, without saying it is the top-15 lines only, implies the work is done. It is not.

§6What is healthy, and what to leave alone

Racks and tray. $220,604 tray plus $46,381 strut = $266,985, 32% of analyzed spend, matched to RKS at 54% complete and the best adjusted PF on the job (1.75). Most-complete work, most-purchased material. Leave it alone.
Conduit and fittings at $111,916 on 2–5% installed is correct behavior for prefab, which pulls conduit early — but it is $112K of cash tied up ahead of the field. Hold further pulls if prefab already has what Area 1 needs.
Material by area cannot be produced at all today. The requisition line carries no area_id. That section renders as a stated gap rather than an allocation, and the three-way quantity check — feet purchased ≥ feet fabricated ≥ feet installed, per area — is the flag engine that goes live the day quantities land. Installed > fabricated is impossible; purchased >> fabricated is over-order or waste.

Commercial · pay applications 14 / 16 / 17 · two instruments, four angles

Cash & Billing

Every figure below was read twice by two independent instruments — a text-layer parse of 262 line items across 28 pages, and a vision read of every page — which never saw each other’s output.

Applications

14 · 16 · 17

Verification run

2026-07-29

Instrument agreement

27 of 27

Line chaining

66 of 66

Written to ledger

nothing — exceptions open

Contract to date

$61,596,763

original $61,593,946 + $2,817 CO

Billed to date

$14,884,367

24.16% — not 28%

Retainage held

$1,039,373

6.98% blended, not 10%

Current payment due

$4,681,771

App 17

Approved CO, no SOV line

$2,050,557

nothing to bill it against

§1The verified positionG702 App 17

Original contract$61,593,946.00

Approved change orders in the contract sum$2,817.00

Contract to date$61,596,763.00

Completed and stored to date (App 17)$14,884,367.03

Billed % of contract24.16%

Retainage held — 6.98% blended$1,039,372.54

Earned less retainage$13,844,994.49

Paid through App 16$9,163,223.39

CURRENT PAYMENT DUE$4,681,771.10

Balance to finish, including retainage$47,751,768.51

Application	Completed & stored	Retainage	Earned less retainage	Execution
App 14 — April	PENDING	PENDING	PENDING	executed · envelope A960D98D, signed 04/22/26
App 15	—	—	—	NOT IN THE FILE SET — money chains across the gap
App 16 — May	PENDING	PENDING	$9,163,223.39	no signature, no Docusign — yet prints AMOUNT CERTIFIED
App 17 — June	$14,884,367.03	$1,039,372.54	$13,844,994.49	no signature, no Docusign — yet prints AMOUNT CERTIFIED

Verification angle	What it tests	Result
1 · Internal arithmetic	line sums vs printed G702 totals	0.00 difference on all three
2 · Period continuity	line 7 = prior line 6; column D per line	exact · 66 of 66 lines chain
3 · Instrument agreement	text layer vs vision, value by value	27 of 27 agree
4 · Retainage recomputed	10% × completed vs printed	5 lines off

Angle 3 is the one that matters: at least one angle has to come from outside the document’s own text. Vision is a genuinely different instrument and it agreed on every figure. All three applications are dated 22–24 days before the period end they bill.

§2Retainage exceptions — $449,064.15 under-heldangle 4

Item	Description	Completed	Held	10% would be	Difference	Read
0004	ADMIN Direct Job Costs	$2,502,444.02	$0.00	$250,244.40	−$250,244.40	may be retainage-free by contract — confirm the term
0064	FEE	$1,926,304.56	$0.00	$192,630.46	−$192,630.46	may be retainage-free by contract — confirm the term
0003	GC Onsite Trailers / Supervision	$78,400.00	$1,161.03	$7,840.00	−$6,678.97	mechanical — held 10% of the period, not the cumulative
0043	AREA 5 Power Branch Devices	$736,855.91	$74,175.26	$73,685.59	+$489.67	mechanical — April over-hold rode forward unchanged
0042	AREA 5 Lighting Branch	$1,057,406.25	$105,740.63	$105,740.62	+$0.01	rounding
Net under-held against a 10% rule					−$449,064.15	held blended 6.98% against a stated 7.0% / 0.0% split

Nothing has been written to the ledger. Items 0004 and 0064 may be intentionally retainage-free by contract — that is a term to confirm, not an error to assume. The retainage findings and the revised-SOV breaches are exceptions requiring a human decision before the load.

§3Change orders with nowhere to billCO log r4 vs G702 App 18

Approved & booked$2,896,635

Approved by verbal — log update pending$1,960,728

Total approved per the CO log$4,857,363

Net change by change orders in the contract sum$2,817

APPROVED, NOT IN THE CONTRACT SUM$4,854,546

of which: no SOV line exists to bill it against$2,050,557.00

Still pending — 23 items, all statuses$2,289,071

$2,050,557.00 of approved change-order value has no schedule-of-values line to bill against. It is approved work, it is being executed, and there is no row on the G703 that can carry it. Until a line is created it cannot appear in a requisition, which means it cannot be certified, which means it cannot be paid — regardless of the fact that it is approved. This is a billing-mechanics failure, not a commercial dispute, and it is fixable in one SOV revision.

The revised SOV does not adopt cleanly. Both of its columns total $61,593,946.00 — the original contract — so it is short the $2,817 approved change order, and items 0065 / 0066 are absent entirely.
Nine lines go retroactively over 100% complete if it is adopted, because work already billed exceeds the new scheduled value. Worst: AREA 5 Fire Alarm — $281,953.88 billed against a new scheduled value of $0.00. AREA 5 Cable Tray lands at 671%; AREA 5 as a phase reaches 203%.
PC 58 reads “Engineering (formerly Permit Fees)” and moves $392,541 → $1,900,000, +384%, inside a document that asserts it is not a contract increase.
The G703’s $8,773,715 “Change Order Subtotal” is a different thing entirely — original-contract structure items including supplier fire alarm / VESDA equipment, seismic, excavation and the $8,033,992 FEE line. It is not change-order value and must never be netted against the CO log.

§4Billed, earned and the cash curvetwo numbers, two names

Two different numbers, two different names, never one label. billed_pct is computed from the G702 and is 24.16%. earned_value_pct carries its own stated basis. The 28% previously published reconciles to neither and does not print.

No cash curve is shown. A cash position is receipts minus disbursements. acct_ap holds no rows and no invoice carries a received date, so neither side exists in the data. Any month-by-month cash figure would be invented.
Committed outflows: partner draws ~7/31 — HBF ~$650K, E-J ~$200K. The June requisition funds early August at ~$1.0M and carries field labor through August.
Weeks of payroll covered is the one number that answers “are we funded”. Weekly payroll is not in any supplied file, so the KPI renders PENDING rather than being back-solved from headcount.

Report provenance — what a Velorin report carries that a Word document cannot. Every figure on every page above is a named field resolved by one calculation engine, and every field carries four things with it: the source file and grain it came from, the data date that source was cut at, the formula that produced it, and the checks that were run — footing assertions, cross-instrument agreement, duplicate-week detection, ceiling caps, and the single-application rule on the 22% factor. Nothing in a template computes. That is the only reason the GC-facing report and the internal report can be guaranteed to agree, which is the failure this build exists to fix.

A figure that cannot be sourced is not estimated, smoothed, or quietly omitted — it renders as PENDING with the reason and the file that would unblock it, and the report says on its face how much of itself is missing (materials reconciliation coverage 53.0%, cost-code earned coverage 92.6%, unclassified share 27.2%). Six figures on this build are pending source and three — the 373,228 forecast EAC, the 382,442 P6 resource-loaded total and the 390,360 “EAC @ raw 0.78 PF” — are carried as not reproducible from the documents supplied rather than repeated.

Regeneration is deterministic. Set the period selector to any past data date and the engine re-resolves every field against the source snapshots as they stood on that date. The same report, regenerated a year from now for week 30 of 2026, reproduces byte-identical numbers — including the pending markers, including the exceptions, including the credit mode footnote. Reports are re-runnable evidence, not documents somebody retyped.

Financial›Contract›Billing · Job 250750HB

Billing VERIFIED 2026-07-29

CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · E-J Electric / HB Frazer. Applications 14, 16 and 17 are loaded and reconciled; every original PDF and workbook is filed in the vault and linked from the register below. Three exceptions are open and all three touch the 8/1 application — nothing has been written to acct_ar or acct_ap until they are decided.

2 instruments · 4 angles · 28 pages read 3 exceptions block 8/1

Contract to date

$61,596,763.00

orig $61,593,946.00 + CO $2,817.00

Billed to date

$14,884,367.03

24.16% complete · App 17

Retainage held

$1,039,372.54

6.98% blended · $449,064.15 under-held

Current payment due

$4,681,771.10

period to 06/30/26 · unsigned

Balance to finish

$47,751,768.51

incl. retainage

Exceptions

3 undecided · +14 on the CO log

Pay application registerJOB 250750HB3 filed1 missingclick a filename to open it in the vault

App	Period to	Source document · vault	Completed & stored	Retainage	Earned less ret.	Less previous	Current due	Signature
14	04/30/26	8 pp · 146 KB · G702 + G703	4,841,025.64	229,525.16	4,611,500.48	1,118,393.93	3,493,106.55	DOCUSIGNED env A960D98D · 04/22/26
15	—	NOT IN FILE SET money chains across the gap — App 16 “less previous” 4,611,500.48 = App 14 earned less retainage, to the cent	—	—	—	—	—	NUMBERING BREAK unexplained · confirm
16	05/31/26	8 pp · 38 KB · G702 + G703	9,790,503.31	627,279.92	9,163,223.39	4,611,500.48	4,551,722.91	UNSIGNED no envelope · certifies anyway
17	06/30/26	8 pp · 39 KB · G702 + G703 · 66 lines	14,884,367.03	1,039,372.54	13,844,994.49	9,163,223.39	4,681,771.10	UNSIGNED no envelope · certifies anyway

7 sheets · 41 KB · revised schedule of values

4 pp · 13 KB · 64 lines compared

38 PCOs · 239 KB · snapshot 07/27/26 14:02

Vault — every original is filed unaltered, hash-sealed and read-only. Last opened: nothing this session

executedcertifies without a signaturegap in the numberingall three applications are dated 22–24 days before the period end they bill

Verification — four angles, two instrumentsRUN 2026-07-293 PASS1 EXCEPTION RAISED

ANGLE 1

Internal arithmetic

Every G703 line summed and set against the printed G702 totals, application by application.

0.00 difference

on all three · 14 / 16 / 17

ANGLE 2

Period continuity

Line 7 against the prior line 6, and column D line by line across both handoffs.

exact · 66 of 66 chain

including across the App 15 gap

ANGLE 3

Instrument agreement

pdfplumber text layer against vision — 28 pages rendered and read by eye, value by value, neither reader seeing the other.

27 of 27 agreeOUTSIDE

zero disagreements

ANGLE 4

Retainage recomputed

10% of completed-to-date computed independently and set against what the application prints as held.

5 lines off

raised as exception 2, not corrected in place

A skipped check cannot look like a passed one. Each angle above is a stated instrument, a stated population and a stated result — 262 line items across 28 pages, zero null fields. An angle that did not run has no population and no number, so it reads as blank rather than green; angle 4 found a difference and is shown amber with the difference carried into the exceptions below rather than quietly rounded away. Angle 3 is the one the doctrine requires: at least one instrument from outside the document’s own text layer.

Exceptions blocking the 8/1 applicationHUMAN DECISION REQUIRED3 undecided

$2,050,557.00 of approved change orders has no SOV line to bill against

Owner CO 5 · PCO 062 · Bulletin #1 (basket tray, runway tray, site lighting, security) $575,589.00 approved 06/03/26, 35% complete. Owner CO 6 · PCO 096 · Bulletin #2 (EV charger, furniture clusters, IDF room power, RM 101 power, fire alarm) $462,659.00 approved 06/08/26, 15%. Owner CO 7 · PCO 096 · Bulletin #2 Security $1,012,309.00 approved 06/09/26, 15%. All three were approved before the 06/30 cut-off and all three carry JDS SUBMISSION STATUS = YES, so this is not a timing difference. The G702 still shows $2,817.00 of net change orders — lines 0065 and 0066 — and has done for four applications running.

Contract impact

$2,050,557.00

Already earned at % complete

$422,701.35

Billable today

$0.00

Owner

Project Manager · E-J

The fix: three new G703 lines — 0067 CO 5 $575,589.00, 0068 CO 6 $462,659.00, 0069 CO 7 $1,012,309.00 — and a contract-to-date revision from $61,596,763.00 to $63,647,320.00.

Decision: UNDECIDEDnothing is written to the ledger while this is open

Retainage is $449,064.15 under-held across five lines

Item 0004 ADMIN Direct Job Costs and item 0064 FEE hold $0.00 against $4,428,748.58 of completed work — $2,502,444.02 and $1,926,304.56 respectively, −$250,244.40 and −$192,630.46 against a 10% line rate. These two may be contractually retainage-free; that is a term to confirm, not an error to assume. Item 0003 GC Onsite Trailers / Supervision holds $1,161.03 — 10% of the current period instead of 10% of the $78,400.00 cumulative, −$6,678.97. Item 0043 AREA 5 Power Branch Devices is riding a +$489.67 over-hold forward from April unchanged through May and June. Item 0042 is +$0.01 and is noise.

Net under-held

−$449,064.15

Blended rate printed

6.98%

Lines affected

5 of 66

Owner

Contract Administrator

The fix: confirm the contract terms on 0004 and 0064 before touching them; recompute 0003 on the cumulative column; back the $489.67 out of 0043 in the 8/1 application.

Decision: UNDECIDEDnothing is written to the ledger while this is open

The revised SOV totals $61,593,946.00 — the original contract, not the contract to date

Both columns of EJ HBF Revised SOV.xlsx total the original figure. It is short the $2,817.00 approved change order and items 0065 / 0066 are absent entirely. Nine lines go retroactively over 100% complete if it is adopted, because work already billed exceeds the new scheduled value — worst is AREA 5 Fire Alarm at $281,953.88 billed against a new scheduled value of $0.00. AREA 5 Cable Tray lands at 671%; AREA 5 as a phase reaches 203%. PC 58 reads “Engineering (formerly Permit Fees)” and moves $392,541 → $1,900,000, +384%, inside a document that asserts it is not a contract increase.

Short of contract to date

−$2,817.00

Lines breached

9 of 64

Value already billed on them

$5,165,574.37

Owner

Owner · EJ HBF

The fix: do not adopt as-is. Either the revised SOV is reissued at $61,596,763.00 with lines 0065 / 0066 restored, or every over-billed line is re-based and the difference is documented as a credit.

Decision: UNDECIDEDnothing is written to the ledger while this is open

A decision here is a decision, not a posting. Accept queues the stated fix into the 8/1 application for the preparer to execute; Reject records that the figure stands as billed and the difference is documented; Ask routes the question out and holds the line open. None of the three writes to acct_ar or acct_ap — the ledger only moves once the amended G703 comes back and clears the same four angles.

8/1 billing readiness4 red4 amber2 green

Three G703 lines opened for CO 5 / 6 / 7

nothing approved can be billed until 0067–0069 exist

$2,050,557.00

G702 contract to date revised

$61,596,763.00 → $63,647,320.00

+$2,050,557.00

Revised SOV adoption decided

9 lines go retroactively over 100% if adopted as-is

9 lines

Revised SOV reissued at contract to date

currently totals the original $61,593,946.00

−$2,817.00

Retainage terms confirmed on 0004 and 0064

contractually retainage-free, or under-held

$442,874.86

Item 0003 recomputed on the cumulative column

holding 10% of the period, not of $78,400.00

$6,678.97

Item 0043 over-hold backed out

riding forward unchanged since April

$489.67

Apps 16 and 17 executed in Docusign

both certify an amount with no signature and no envelope

$9,233,494.01

Arithmetic, continuity and instrument agreement

0.00 on all three · 66 of 66 · 27 of 27

$0.00

App 15 gap reconciled on the money

numbering break only — the chain is exact

$0.00

If every exception resolves — what App 18 should look like

Contract to date, revised$63,647,320.00

Completed & stored$15,307,068.38

Percent complete24.05%

Added this period, CO 5 / 6 / 7$422,701.35

Retainage on the added lines, at 10%$42,270.14

Retainage correction, 0003 + 0043$6,189.30

Balance to finish$49,379,624.16

NEW G703 LINES
0067 CO 5 · Bulletin #1   575,589.00 @ 35%
0068 CO 6 · Bulletin #2   462,659.00 @ 15%
0069 CO 7 · Bulletin #2 Security   1,012,309.00 @ 15%

The retainage rate on the three new lines is not settled by this page. $42,270.14 is 10% of the earned value, shown so the shape of App 18 is complete; the rate itself falls out of the same decision that resolves items 0004 and 0064. It is an illustration, not a posted figure.

Schedule of values — G703, application 1766 LINES9 over 100% under the revised SOVscheduled $61,596,763.00

columns as printed; the revised column is the comparison PDF, not the application

Item	Description	Scheduled value	Revised SOV	Completed to date	%	Retainage
0049	AREA 5 Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,620,678.00	565,597.98 146% REV	826,545.78	51.0%	82,654.57
0042	AREA 5 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	604,843.52 175% REV	1,057,406.25	78.9%	105,740.63
0043	AREA 5 Power Branch Devices	1,160,027.00	577,483.52 128% REV	736,855.91	63.5%	74,175.26
0044	AREA 5 Cable Tray Ladder Racks	1,003,037.00	113,990.16 671% REV	764,596.28	76.2%	76,459.63
0045	AREA 5 Low Voltage Raceways BMS EPMS IT Security Access Control	827,198.00	284,695.05 248% REV	705,926.42	85.3%	70,592.64
0010	AREA 1 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling Devices Testing	510,521.00	288,439.35 110% REV	316,523.02	62.0%	31,652.30
0019	AREA 2 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling Devices Testing	510,521.00	288,439.35 103% REV	296,102.18	58.0%	29,610.22
0046	AREA 5 Fire Alarm Raceways Cabling Devices Testing	510,521.00	0.00 SV → $0.00	281,953.88	55.2%	28,195.39
0020	AREA 2 Vesda Raceways Cabling Test Ports Testing	326,663.00	125,734.66 143% REV	179,664.65	55.0%	17,966.47
0064	FEE	8,033,992.00	8,033,992.00	1,926,304.56	24.0%	0.00
0004	ADMIN Direct Job Costs	6,856,011.00	6,002,011.00	2,502,444.02	36.5%	0.00
0054	ROOF Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,670,270.00	2,597,545.48	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0013	AREA 1 Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,620,678.00	2,418,757.88	680,684.76	42.0%	68,068.47
0022	AREA 2 Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,620,678.00	1,537,037.92	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0031	AREA 3 Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,620,678.00	1,507,527.85	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0040	AREA 4 Mechanical Power Raceways Cabling Terminations	1,620,678.00	1,477,134.72	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0006	AREA 1 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	1,470,135.40	664,615.25	49.6%	66,461.53
0015	AREA 2 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	686,782.76	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0024	AREA 3 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	830,140.76	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0033	AREA 4 Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	665,877.15	254,591.45	19.0%	25,459.15
0051	ROOF Lighting Branch Controls Fixtures	1,339,955.00	1,827,275.23	58,524.42	4.4%	5,852.44
0001	GC Equipment	1,273,020.00	1,273,020.00	318,255.00	25.0%	31,825.50
0007	AREA 1 Power Branch Devices	1,160,027.00	1,058,137.65	730,817.01	63.0%	73,081.70
0016	AREA 2 Power Branch Devices	1,160,027.00	457,380.25	0.00	0.0%	0.00
0025	AREA 3 Power Branch Devices	1,160,027.00	569,492.83	255,205.94	22.0%	25,520.59
0034	AREA 4 Power Branch Devices	1,160,027.00	460,263.76	243,605.67	21.0%	24,360.57

40 further lines not shown — $18,131,754.00 scheduled, $2,083,744.58 completed. All 66 were read, summed and chained; the 26 above are the top 20 by scheduled value plus every flagged line.

billed above the revised scheduled valueretainage $0.00 against completed worknot started

The doctrine this page is written under. No money figure is written here unless at least three independent checks agree on it, and at least one of those checks comes from outside the document — on this run that was vision, reading all 28 rendered pages by eye with no text extraction, agreeing 27 of 27. A figure that cannot be resolved is raised as an exception, never guessed: the retainage on items 0004 and 0064 is shown as a difference against a 10% line rate and marked as a term to confirm, not silently corrected; the revised SOV is shown at what it actually totals rather than at what it ought to total; the $2,050,557.00 of approved change orders sits at $0.00 billable until a G703 line exists to carry it. Nothing on this screen has been posted to acct_ar or acct_ap. The originals are in the vault, unaltered, and every figure above traces to one of them.

Planning›Program›Schedule · Primavera P6 Update 21

Schedule UPDATE 21

CTP LANCASTER CAMPUS PROJECT - Update 21 · data date 30 Jun 26 · must finish by 10 Nov 27. Parsed straight from fa6e64f2-CTP_LANCASTER_CAMPUS1612Update_21_1.xer (P6 26.6 export, written 13 Jul 26 by Kedar Pitkar). 13,831 activities, 31,057 logic ties, 2,069 WBS nodes. Every figure on this screen is computed from that file — nothing is modeled.

Activities

13,831

12,006 task · 1,760 milestone

Complete

2,887

20.9% of the schedule

In progress

217

213 started before the data date

Not started

10,727

77.6% of the schedule

Critical activities

432

total float ≤ 0 days

Float on critical path

all 74 chain links at zero

Finish vs must-finish

10 Nov 27 vs 10 Nov 27

No predecessor

160

511 have no successor

Gantt Jan 2025 → Dec 2027306 activities plotted

Look-ahead from data date

2 week

881

activities start by 14 Jul 26

7 critical69 E-J192 h loaded

4 week

1,652

activities start by 28 Jul 26

14 critical167 E-J576 h loaded

6 week

2,144

activities start by 11 Aug 26

19 critical212 E-J1,952 h loaded

8 week

2,749

activities start by 25 Aug 26

33 critical314 E-J4,336 h loaded

Activity

Complete In progress Not started Critical (float ≤ 0) Milestone Float tail Data date

Bars are positioned from the activity's own dates in the XER — actual start/finish where the activity is statused, early start/finish where it is not. The inner darker bar is physical percent complete as recorded in P6, not an estimate. Float tails are total float converted from workdays to calendar days at the schedule's 5-day calendar (12,512 of 13,831 activities). Arrows show the reconstructed zero-float chain from TASKPRED with the relationship type on each link.

Critical path 74 activities24 Jun 26 → 10 Nov 27
0 days float end to end

#	Activity	Area	Start	Finish	Link
1	A1-ER-5920 A1 - ER 110 - OH Conduit R/I IN P	Area 1	24 Jun 26	01 Jul 26	—
2	A1-ER-6490 A1 - ER 111 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	02 Jul 26	07 Jul 26	FS
3	A1-ER-7060 A1 - ER 508 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	02 Jul 26	10 Jul 26	SS
4	A1-ER-7630 A1 - ER 509 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	09 Jul 26	16 Jul 26	SS +4
5	A1-ER-8200 A1 - ER 510 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	09 Jul 26	16 Jul 26	SS
6	A1-ER-8770 A1 - ER 511 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	17 Jul 26	24 Jul 26	FS
7	A1-IB-2070 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 1 & 2 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	17 Jul 26	24 Jul 26	SS
8	A1-IB-2110 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 3 & 4 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	27 Jul 26	03 Aug 26	FS
9	A1-IB-2150 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 5 & 6 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	04 Aug 26	11 Aug 26	FS
10	A1-IB-2190 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 7 & 8 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	12 Aug 26	19 Aug 26	FS
11	A1-IB-2230 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 9 & 10 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	12 Aug 26	19 Aug 26	SS
12	A1-IB-2270 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - OH Conduit Racks NOT	Area 1	20 Aug 26	27 Aug 26	FS
13	A1-IB-2450 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - Install Ceiling NOT	Area 1	28 Aug 26	03 Sep 26	FS
14	A1-IB-2520 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - OH Trays NOT	Area 1	04 Sep 26	09 Sep 26	FS
15	A1-IB-2590 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - OH Mechanical NOT	Area 1	10 Sep 26	15 Sep 26	FS
16	A1-IB-2660 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - Room Ready for HACs NOT	Area 1	15 Sep 26	15 Sep 26	FF
17	A1-IB-2850 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - HAC Area Ready Checklist NOT	Area 1	16 Sep 26	22 Sep 26	FS
18	A1-IB-2990 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 11 & 12 - Install HAC 1 NOT	Area 1	23 Sep 26	25 Sep 26	FS
19	A1-IB-3010 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Install HAC 1 NOT	Area 1	23 Sep 26	25 Sep 26	SS
20	A1-IB-3020 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Install HAC 2 NOT	Area 1	23 Sep 26	25 Sep 26	SS
21	A1-IB-3090 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Install FWU/ PDU Skids NOT	Area 1	28 Sep 26	02 Oct 26	FS
22	A1-IB-3220 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Install Buffer Tanks & CDUs NOT	Area 1	05 Oct 26	09 Oct 26	FS
23	A1-IB-3500 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Pull Feeder Wire NOT	Area 1	12 Oct 26	13 Nov 26	FS
24	A1-IB-3720 A1 - IB Hall - HAC 13 & 14 - Final Electrical Connections NOT	Area 1	16 Nov 26	30 Nov 26	FS
25	COMM-1111 Commissioning - Level 3 - Commence NOT	Area 1	20 Nov 26	20 Nov 26	SS +4
26	COM-1030 ER 105 - DS-GH1-C2 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	20 Nov 26	02 Dec 26	SS
27	COM-1140 ER 107 - DS-GH1-A1 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	03 Dec 26	14 Dec 26	FS
28	COM-1570 ER 109 - DS-GH1-C3 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Dec 26	24 Dec 26	FS
29	COM-1580 ER 109 - DS-GH1-C4 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Dec 26	24 Dec 26	SS
30	COM-1590 ER 110 - DS-GH1-B3 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Dec 26	24 Dec 26	SS
31	COM-1600 ER 110 - DS-GH1-B4 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Dec 26	24 Dec 26	SS
32	COM-3450 DS-GH1-B4 - ACC-IBH-04 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	28 Dec 26	04 Jan 27	FS
33	COM-4320 DS-GH1-C4 - ACC-IBH-06 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	05 Jan 27	11 Jan 27	FS
34	COM-4740 DS-GH1-A4 - ACC-GH1-03 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	12 Jan 27	18 Jan 27	FS
35	COM-4850 DS-IBH-C2 - ACC-IBH-07 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	19 Jan 27	25 Jan 27	FS
36	COM-6090 DS-IBH-A2 - ACC-GH1-02 - L3 - Prefunctional Testing NOT	Area 1	26 Jan 27	01 Feb 27	FS
37	COMM-1114 Commissioning - Level 3 - Completion & Ready for Level 4 Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	01 Feb 27	01 Feb 27	FF
38	COMM-1115 Sequence of Operation Testing & Ready for Level 4 Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	02 Feb 27	08 Feb 27	FS
39	COM-7090 Commissioning - Level 4 - Commence NOT	Area 1	09 Feb 27	09 Feb 27	FS
40	COM-7080 ER 104 - DS-GH1- D2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	09 Feb 27	10 Feb 27	SS
41	COM-7190 ER 105 - DS-GH1- C1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	11 Feb 27	12 Feb 27	FS
42	COM-7200 ER 105 - DS-GH1-C2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	11 Feb 27	12 Feb 27	SS
43	COM-7390 ER 106 - DS-GH1- B1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Feb 27	16 Feb 27	FS
44	COM-7400 ER 106 - DS-GH1- B2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Feb 27	16 Feb 27	SS
45	COM-7790 ER 107 - DS-GH1-A1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	17 Feb 27	18 Feb 27	FS
46	COM-7800 ER 107 - DS-GH1-A2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	17 Feb 27	18 Feb 27	SS
47	COM-8190 ER 108 - DS-GH1-D3 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	19 Feb 27	22 Feb 27	FS
48	COM-8200 ER 108 - DS-GH1-D4 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	19 Feb 27	22 Feb 27	SS
49	COM-8930 ER 109 - DS-GH1-C3 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	23 Feb 27	24 Feb 27	FS
50	COM-8940 ER 109 - DS-GH1-C4 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	23 Feb 27	24 Feb 27	SS
51	COM-9760 ER 110 - DS-GH1-B3 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	25 Feb 27	26 Feb 27	FS
52	COM-9770 ER 110 - DS-GH1-B4 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	25 Feb 27	26 Feb 27	SS
53	COM-10560 ER 111 - DS-GH1-A3 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	01 Mar 27	02 Mar 27	FS
54	COM-10570 ER 111 - DS-GH1-A4 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	01 Mar 27	02 Mar 27	SS
55	COM-11330 ER 508 - DS-IBH-D2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	03 Mar 27	04 Mar 27	FS
56	COM-11340 ER 508 - DS-IBH-D1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	03 Mar 27	03 Mar 27	SS
57	COM-12440 ER 509 - DS-IBH-C2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	04 Mar 27	05 Mar 27	FS
58	COM-12450 ER 509 - DS-IBH-C1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	04 Mar 27	05 Mar 27	SS
59	COM-13230 ER 510 - DS-IBH-B2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	08 Mar 27	09 Mar 27	FS
60	COM-13240 ER 510 - DS-IBH-B1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	08 Mar 27	09 Mar 27	SS
61	COM-14010 ER 511 - DS-IBH-A2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	10 Mar 27	11 Mar 27	FS
62	COM-14020 ER 511 - DS-IBH-A1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	10 Mar 27	11 Mar 27	SS
63	COM-14700 ER 511 - UPS-IBH-A1-2 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	12 Mar 27	12 Mar 27	FS
64	COM-15200 PDU-IBH-A1-1 -L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	15 Mar 27	16 Mar 27	FS
65	COM-15590 RPP-IBH-A1-1 - L4 - Functional Testing NOT	Area 1	17 Mar 27	17 Mar 27	FS
66	COM-15730 Commissioning - Level 4 - Completion NOT	Area 1	17 Mar 27	17 Mar 27	FF
67	CON-A1-T&C-1030 A1 - L5 - Integrated Systems Testing NOT	Area 1	18 Mar 27	24 Mar 27	FS
68	CON-A1-T&C-1040 A1 - Owner Load bank removal, final punch list, closeout NOT	Area 1	25 Mar 27	21 Apr 27	FS
69	CON-MS-A1-1440 A1 - GPU Hall - Commissioning - Level 5 Finish NOT	Area 1	21 Apr 27	21 Apr 27	FS
70	MILE-1050 GPU Hall 1 & IB Hall Substantial Completion (Area 1) NOT	Area 1	21 Apr 27	21 Apr 27	FF
71	MILE-1070 GPU Hall 2 Substantial Completion (Area 2) NOT	Area 2	14 Jun 27	14 Jun 27	FF
72	MILE-1080 GPU Hall 3 Substantial Completion (Area 3) NOT	Area 3	16 Aug 27	16 Aug 27	FF
73	MILE-1090 GPU Hall 4 Substantial Completion (Area 4) NOT	Area 4	09 Nov 27	09 Nov 27	FF
74	TENANT-MILE-1320 RFS Date - GPU Hall 4 NOT	Area 4	10 Nov 27	10 Nov 27	FS

Reconstructed by walking TASKPRED forward through activities with total float ≤ 0 and keeping the longest continuous chain. 44 of these 74 activities are electrical scope (highlighted); the remainder is commissioning of electrical equipment. P6's own driving_path_flag is set on 738 activities across all float paths.

Data quality what the export does and does not contain

Predecessors present 31,057

TASKPRED is fully populated — FS 22,857, FF 6,328, SS 1,855, SF 17. An earlier read of the loaded database showed no logic; that was a load defect, not the export.

Activities with no predecessor 160

511 have no successor and 72 are open at both ends. Downstream float on those paths is not trustworthy.

No resource assignment 13,117

Only 714 of 13,831 activities are resource-loaded (714 assignment rows, 56,024 budgeted hours, 3 resources in the dictionary). Manpower and earned value cannot be derived from this file.

No area derivable 1,243

12,588 activities were placed: 12,475 from the WBS path, 80 from tokens in the activity name, 33 from the Trade Partner – Area code. The rest are procurement, shop drawings, change orders and campus-wide scope. None were guessed.

Area in the WBS disagrees with the activity name 83

For example CON-A1-ADM-1000 is named “A1 - Fitout and MEP” but sits under the Area 4 branch. This screen follows the WBS and records the disagreement rather than picking a winner.

Activities under a WBS marked DELETE 1,252

They sit under WBS DELETE – DO NOT REFER – DELETE yet still carry dates, logic and float. 9% of the schedule.

Baseline in the export none

No baseline payload and plan_end_date is empty, so variance against an approved baseline is not available from this file.

Date constraints 703

554 must-finish-on-or-after, 130 must-start-on-or-after, 14 as-late-as-possible. Total float is measured against the 2027-11-10 must-finish, which is why nothing is negative yet.

Subcontractor UDF populated on 32

of 13,831 activities. The Trade Partner activity code is the usable attribution (13,761 activities carry one) and is what this screen uses.

By area derived from WBS path, activity code and name tokens

Area	Acts	Done	Progress	First start	Last finish	Min float	Crit	Status
Area 1	5,630	1,541	27.4%	23 Jun 25	22 Apr 27	0 d	222	CRITICAL
Area 2	2,399	294	12.3%	23 Jun 25	15 Jun 27	0 d	103	CRITICAL
Area 3	2,086	209	10.0%	23 Jun 25	17 Aug 27	0 d	51	CRITICAL
Area 4	1,990	130	6.5%	23 Jun 25	10 Nov 27	0 d	44	CRITICAL
Area 5	483	38	7.9%	23 Jun 25	03 Dec 26	6 d	0	FLOAT
No area derivable procurement, shop drawings, change orders, permits, fabrication and campus-wide scope — not a tagging failure	1,243	675	54.3%	31 Jan 25	12 Oct 27	0 d	12	NO AREA

Float distribution total float, workdays

Zero or negative

432

1 to 5 days

592

6 to 20 days

2,356

More than 20 days

7,564

Not calculated (complete)

2,887

1,024 activities sit at five days or less — 9.4% of the incomplete schedule, concentrated in Area 1 (364 near-critical) and Area 2 (185). There is no negative float anywhere: the schedule is pulled exactly to the must-finish date, so the first sign of slip will be negative float on Update 22, not a later finish date.

Electrical scope Trade Partner activity code
2,722 activities · 19.7% of schedule

E-J Electric / H.B. Frazer JV

Low voltage electrical709

Complete57

In progress10

Not started642

Date range14 Jul 25 – 29 Mar 27

On critical path6

Median float60 d

Budgeted hours4,256

Lighthouse

Medium voltage electrical2,008

On critical path101

All electrical, float ≤ 0107

All electrical, 1–5 d119

All electrical, 6–20 d410

All electrical, >20 d1,757

Electrical date range11 Jul 25 – 13 Oct 27

Median float36 d

E-J shows a median 60 days of float and only 6 activities at zero — but E-J low-voltage work sits downstream of the medium-voltage and commissioning sequence that is actually critical. That float is only real while Lighthouse and the Level 3 / Level 4 commissioning sequence hold.

Budgeted hours by month resource-loaded activities only

447

Jul26

2,990

Aug26

7,733

Sep26

11,454

Oct26

9,473

Nov26

8,764

Dec26

3,618

Jan27

2,330

Feb27

6,472

Mar27

2,442

Apr27

295

May27

This is not the manpower curve for the job. It is the curve for the 714 resource-loaded activities (5.2% of the schedule, 56,024 budgeted hours in total), peaking in October 2026. The remaining 13,117 activities carry no assignment, so a site-wide histogram cannot be built from this export.

Field›Commissioning›Program Generator

Program Generator L1–L5 · LOTO · EM · ITP

Reads the equipment register, the approved submittals, the one-line, the specification and the schedule — and writes the test scripts, the isolation programs and the inspection plans, every step carrying the document, revision and clause it came from. CTP Lancaster LPE-01 · 36-25-231

Assets in scope

6,577

68 register types → 61 canonical

Programs Velorin generates

24,578

across 9 program types

Functional tests today

Tests module: zero records

Steps with full provenance

96.3%

3.7% routed to a human as TBC

Authoring hours avoided, net

7,904

assumption shown below, not hidden

What the generator reads
6 SOURCESHONESTY VISIBLE

Equipment register

INGESTED

CxAlloy export · 6,577 assets · 68 types · 12 disciplines

Assets ingested100%

Typed attributes resolved62.1%

7 type synonyms merged — LV Switchboard / Low Voltage Switchboard, MV Transformer / Medium Voltage Transformer and 5 more. Merge is proposed, not applied — awaiting E-J confirmation.

1 duplicate tag: UPS-GH1-A1-1 exists twice with two record ids. Both would generate a full program. Held.

Location present on 12.7% of the sampled records. 2,494 assets generate with a canonical type but no location — their LOTO boundary cannot be derived and their EM plans are suppressed.

Approved submittals

84.6% RESOLVED

1,412 logged · 964 approved or approved-as-noted

Assets with every generating parameter resolved84.6%

Div 26 sections covered91.2%

536 RPP — submittal 26 24 16 rev 2 under review; main trip unit unknown. 1,608 steps will read “no limit on file” rather than a guessed value.

1,020 UPS battery cabinets — 26 33 53-004 rev 1 is approved-as-noted and its block count contradicts the register. End-of-discharge limits held (TBC-021).

216 CRAH — points list issued as a PDF, not as data. Point-to-point sub-forms generate with a count but no point names.

Net effect: 1,012 assets (15.4%) produce a script with at least one unresolved parameter. Every one of those steps is routed to a human with the question it needs answered. None of them guesses.

One-line diagram

REV 12 · 96% TRACED

E-501 rev 12 · 4 sheets · 1,884 nodes / 2,206 edges parsed

Electrical assets with an upstream source resolved96.1%

Devices with a full source-to-load path88.4%

41 branch panels with no traced source — their L3 gates cannot reach upstream and are downgraded to attested.

GPU Hall 4 MV ring section is drawn future. 168 assets have no source until rev 13 lands.

The MDB-A / MDB-B tie interlock scheme is not annotated (TBC-041). All 24 EM switching plans that cross the tie are held.

Specification sections

283 SECTIONS

Division 26 carries 34 · 26 08 00 Commissioning of Electrical Systems present

Sections ingested100%

Sections mapped to at least one equipment type87.3%

6 sections reference Addendum 4, which is not in the document set. Their derived limits are suppressed.

26 05 73.19 arc-flash study is at rev 2; labels on MDB-A, MDB-B and CPP-GH1-A2-1 were produced from rev 1 (TBC-033). 34 energized steps held.

26 33 53 requires autonomy “at rated load”; design load on CDB-A is 71% of rating. Which one governs changes an acceptance limit (TBC-047).

Schedule — Update 21

SEQUENCING

13,831 activities · 31,057 relationships · data date 2026-06-30 · must finish 2027-11-10

Activities parsed100%

Activities mapped to an asset or system42.8%

Used for test-window placement, vendor and load-bank call-off, and the order scripts are issued in. 432 activities sit at zero float, so a test that slips is a turnover date that slips.

Only 5.2% of activities carry a resource assignment, so crew and duration for each test window come from Velorin’s own model rather than from P6 — and that is stated on every generated window.

1,243 activities have no derivable area; their tests are sequenced by predecessor only.

LOTO boundaries

78% BOUNDED

412 boundaries derived from E-501 rev 12 + the register · 34 published

Electrical assets inside a derived boundary78%

Stored-energy sources resolved61.4%

1,447 assets sit outside any derived boundary — mostly the 2,494 with no location. A boundary Velorin cannot derive is a boundary Velorin refuses to print.

Stored energy (DC bus, battery strings, capacitors, springs, stored pressure) resolved on 61.4% of assets; the rest fall back to the equipment-type default and are flagged as such on the permit.

3 boundaries cross the tie whose interlock is unannotated (TBC-041).

What it writes — select a program to preview
CURRENT SCOPE 6,577 ASSETS

Counts are what the generator would emit against the current asset scope, not a target. The two marked 0 on the job today — L4 and L5 — are the reason this screen exists: the incumbent’s Tests module on this project contains zero records, so there is no functional test and no integrated systems test anywhere on a live data center carrying 12,158 checklists.

Live preview — generated program
UNSIGNED DRAFTCLICK ANY STEP

GENERATED 2026-07-29 14:02 · 41 s

L1L1-FWT-MVS-GH3-C1-1rev 1 draft

MVS-GH3-C1-1 — Medium Voltage Switchgear, 34.5 kV, 1200 A main bus

Manufacturer’s works · witness by Bala + CTP

6 of 22 steps shownWOULD GENERATE 214 OF THESEGOVERNED BY NETA ATS-2021 · ASHRAE Gl 0-2019